FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
| faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
| how big? | |
monkeyboy![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Addict Posts: 521 Kudos: 375 Votes: 223 Registered: 10-Apr-2005 ![]() | ok i'm still looking at stocking options for my 150g tank. and one of the ones i was looking at today are the Iridescent Sharks. Whats the largest anybodys seen? the profile here says 51 inches. 2 LFS i talked with today said largest they seen was between 18-24 inches. how about yous? Fish tanks are an expensive addiction |
NowherMan6![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Master Posts: 1880 Kudos: 922 Votes: 69 Registered: 21-Jun-2004 ![]() | Irr. Sharks are actually a species of catfish. 51 inches sounds about right. They are tank busters in every sense of the word. Not only will they grow length wise, but also will become HUGE in their girth - they're not very suitable for the home aquarium. A 150 gallon tank is still pretty large. If you're looking for a large schooling fish you may be able to work a few tinfoil barbs or even bala sharks. |
houston![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Guru You want what when? Posts: 2623 Kudos: 2462 Votes: 337 Registered: 29-Mar-2003 ![]() | Hey there Monkeyboy ![]() I asked a similar question about this time last year, and the concensus was 50-60 inches. At the time someone even found a wonderful photo to post with it, showing the true size that they can get ie. don't go there, they look so sweet and cute, but uh they will grow![]() [link=Ah Ha, I knew if I looked I could find the post ]http://www.fishprofiles.com/files/forums/General%20Freshwater/54135.html" style="COLOR: #FF1493[/link]Also here is the picture that was sent to me about the cute, little guy ![]() houston attached this image: ![]() "I've got a great ambition to die of exhaustion rather than boredom." Thomas Carlyle |
bettachris![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 3875 Kudos: 4173 Votes: 452 Registered: 13-Jun-2004 ![]() | my guy is over 23 inches, and about 6 years old. |
monkeyboy![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Addict Posts: 521 Kudos: 375 Votes: 223 Registered: 10-Apr-2005 ![]() | many many years. good makes up my mind Fish tanks are an expensive addiction |
sirbooks![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Moderator Sociopath Posts: 3875 Kudos: 5164 Votes: 932 Registered: 26-Jul-2004 ![]() | Yep, they get very long and wide. These sharks definitely should not be kept in aquariums at all, especially considering that they're schooling and (as another poster said in an iridescent shark thread past) are migratory as well. I hate that these fish are commonly sold, considering that it would take a lot of time and money to construct an enclosure suitable for them. No one who buys iridescent sharks will be able to give them good care for their entire lives. I don't even know if a public aquarium would be able to provide decent long-term housing for a school. "good makes up my mind" So you decided not to buy any? |
monkeyboy![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Addict Posts: 521 Kudos: 375 Votes: 223 Registered: 10-Apr-2005 ![]() | actually, i'm not sure lol. i want something of the shark type. but cant find anything that wont get over 40 inches, that will max out at around 24 Fish tanks are an expensive addiction |
ACIDRAIN![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Moderator Posts: 3162 Kudos: 1381 Votes: 416 Registered: 14-Jan-2002 ![]() | Another bad thing about these fish, is that they are very active swimmers and constantly run into the walls of the tank. Many will develope sores on their noses, that can become infected and kill the fish. Not something I would want to show as my center piece fish in a tank. There is always a bigger fish... |
Toirtis![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mega Fish Posts: 1260 Kudos: 529 Votes: 6 Registered: 24-Feb-2003 ![]() | Seen a few dozen at 20"-30"....takes about a year to 14 months to hit 10"-14", under good conditions. |
AshleyNicole![]() Small Fry Posts: 3 Kudos: 2 Votes: 0 Registered: 13-Oct-2005 ![]() | why not go for a school of Bala sharks? They are more ative and interesting than Iridescent sharks, and they won't outgrow your tank. Keeping the irridescent shark in an aquarium is juts plain cruel and will stunt their growth. |
Doedogg![]() ![]() ![]() Banned Posts: 408 Kudos: 737 Votes: 445 Registered: 28-Jan-2004 ![]() | I'd go with the Balas too, my SIL had a school of them and they were really cool to watch. ~ Mae West |
Natalie![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ultimate Fish Guru Apolay Wayyioy Posts: 4499 Kudos: 3730 Votes: 348 Registered: 01-Feb-2003 ![]() | I would go with the Balas as well. They also have a more "sharklike" appearance than the Iridescent Sharks, and max out at about 12-14" long. A school of them is an impressive sight. ![]() I'm not your neighbor, you Bakersfield trash. |
bettachris![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 3875 Kudos: 4173 Votes: 452 Registered: 13-Jun-2004 ![]() | a copper nosed minnows is good, shark like, but without the size. |
| Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies









ie. don't go there, they look so sweet and cute, but uh they will grow













