AquaRank.com

FishProfiles.com Message Forums

faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox
# FishProfiles.com Message Forums
L# Freshwater Aquaria
 L# General Freshwater
  L# new 20g, less space because of rocks
 Post Reply  New Topic
Subscribenew 20g, less space because of rocks
BeastKeeper
-----
Big Fish
Posts: 444
Kudos: 389
Votes: 47
Registered: 27-Apr-2004
male usa
i just started a 20g tank and put about 50-60lbs of rock in the tank. so having so many rocks will this affect my fish?

what will be some good fish to go in the setup?

thanks
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:51Profile Yahoo PM Edit Report 
Babelfish
 
**********
---------------
---------------
---------------
Administrator
Small Fry with Ketchup
Posts: 6833
Kudos: 8324
Votes: 1570
Registered: 17-Apr-2003
female australia us-maryland
Well, you have considerbly less volume of water to work with for one ...if you havent filled the tank yet you can count how much water you're adding...otherwise I'm sure theres some handy dandy equation for figuring displacement....least I'd hope so .

I suggest sticking with smaller fish, nothing over 4" adult size when it comes to a 20 gallons dimensions.

^_^[hr width='40%']
"Has someone taken your faith? It's real, the pain you feel.
The life, the love, You die to heal.
The hope that starts, The broken hearts...
I’ve got another confession my friend, I’m no fool.
I’m getting tired of starting again, Somewhere new."


Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:51Profile Homepage AIM MSN PM Edit Delete Report 
littlemousling
---------------
---------------
Conchiform
Posts: 5230
Registered: 23-Aug-2003
female usa
I'd go with something rockdwelling and territorial, so that you're limited in bioload anyway. A dwarf Julidochromis species would be ideal, say J. transcriptus or J. ornatus. Gorgeous fish, colony/step breeders, and they'll love that rockwork.

-Molly
Visit shelldwellers.com!
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:51Profile Homepage PM Edit Delete Report 
BeastKeeper
-----
Big Fish
Posts: 444
Kudos: 389
Votes: 47
Registered: 27-Apr-2004
male usa
when ever i was adding the rocks while the the tank was full, i had to take out about 8g to fit them all. i would think there are about 12-15g left.

i think ill go with the j. transciptus, but how many could i put in my tank?

thanks
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:51Profile Yahoo PM Edit Delete Report 
littlemousling
---------------
---------------
Conchiform
Posts: 5230
Registered: 23-Aug-2003
female usa
Start with six, remove whichever extras they kick out. You'll probably end up with a pair, maybe two, and soon enough a nice family.

-Molly
Visit shelldwellers.com!
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:51Profile Homepage PM Edit Delete Report 
BeastKeeper
-----
Big Fish
Posts: 444
Kudos: 389
Votes: 47
Registered: 27-Apr-2004
male usa
its problably not a good idea, but could i put in some calvus?
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:51Profile Yahoo PM Edit Delete Report 
littlemousling
---------------
---------------
Conchiform
Posts: 5230
Registered: 23-Aug-2003
female usa
In a 20? I wouldn't, but there's another good option - dwarf compressiceps, like A. compressiceps "Sumbu." They've developed small so as to use shells so you'd want to have some in but they can also utilize rocks. They'll grow somewhat bigger in a tank with rocks than they would with just shells but they'll still be quite small enough.

-Molly
Visit shelldwellers.com!
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:51Profile Homepage PM Edit Delete Report 
Post Reply  New Topic
Jump to: 

The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.

FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies