Review Proposed Changes
Profile: | Auchenoglanis occidentalis occidentalis | ||
Field: | size | ||
Status: | Approved | ||
Votes: | 8 | ||
Submitter: | riri1 | ||
Reason: | shouldn't u put the max size they could grow for the potential size? like said in comments "Those not wishing to own a fish that may approach a potential three feet in length should confine themselves to purchasing the smaller species from the river systems of the volta region, who typically average up to 17 inches and avoid the rift lake specimens" this is just my opinion. | ||
Old Text: | Males: 45;45cm (17.7") Females: cm (0") | New Text: | Males: 89.9;89.9cm (35.4") Females: cm (0") |
Votes | ||
Member | Vote | Weight |
Babelfish | Approve | 4 |
T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | Approve | 1 |
riri1 | Neutral | 0 |
Gone_Troppo | Approve | 2 |
brandeeno | Approve | 1 |
Total: 8 |
Comments | |
riri1 | shouldn't u put the max size they could grow for the potential size? like said in comments "Those not wishing to own a fish that may approach a potential three feet in length should confine themselves to purchasing the smaller species from the river systems of the volta region, who typically average up to 17 inches and avoid the rift lake specimens" this is just my opinion. |
Posted 29-Dec-2008 16:55 | |
brandeeno | Approve |
Posted 06-Jan-2009 06:30 | |
Gone_Troppo | Approve |
Posted 31-Jan-2009 02:29 | |
T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | Approve |
Posted 01-Feb-2009 03:55 | |
Babelfish | Approve |
Posted 03-Feb-2009 05:20 |