Review Proposed Changes
| Profile: | Ancistrus sp. | ||
| Field: | size | ||
| Status: | Rejected | ||
| Votes: | -7 | ||
| Submitter: | T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | ||
| Reason: | My males have already reached, and are continuing growing from, 16cm and the females are holding steady at an average of 14cm. This could just be due to a variance in teh exact species, but I just thought it good to highlight this. | ||
| Old Text: | Males: 12;12cm (4.7") Females: cm (0") | New Text: | Males: 16;14cm (6.3") Females: cm (0") |
| Votes | ||
| Member | Vote | Weight |
| T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | Neutral | 0 |
| Natalie | Reject | -2 |
| sirbooks | Reject | -3 |
| mrwizerd | Reject | -2 |
| Total: -7 | ||
| Comments | |
| T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | My males have already reached, and are continuing growing from, 16cm and the females are holding steady at an average of 14cm. This could just be due to a variance in teh exact species, but I just thought it good to highlight this. |
| T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | Sorry, but there is a spelling mistake. I wrote 'teh exact species' rather than 'the exact species'. Apologies. Tarky |
| sirbooks | Can you confirm that they are not a described species of Ancistrus, and just represent the pool of unknowns? |
| T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | Sorry, but I can't. |
| Natalie | Also, the lengths given for fish in these profiles is standard lenths, which is used in most books and scientific literature. A fish that is 12cm standard length might be 16cm total length. How were you measuring yours? |
| T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | From the tip of their snout to the end of their tails. |
| sirbooks | Reject Then that is going to be total length. |
| Natalie | Reject |
| mrwizerd | Reject |