Review Proposed Changes
| Profile: | Rasbora borapetensis | ||
| Field: | size | ||
| Status: | Rejected | ||
| Votes: | -7 | ||
| Submitter: | Joe Potato | ||
| Reason: | Not in the profile. | ||
| Old Text: | Males: 0;0cm (0") Females: cm (0") | New Text: | Males: 8.9;8.9cm (3.5") Females: cm (0") |
| Votes | ||
| Member | Vote | Weight |
| Joe Potato | Neutral | 0 |
| Babelfish | Reject | -4 |
| Doedogg | Reject | -2 |
| longhairedgit | Reject | -1 |
| Total: -7 | ||
| Comments | |
| Joe Potato | Not in the profile. |
| Joe Potato | Those are in cm, by the way. I put it in inches, but I guess it likes SI. |
| Gaia | Does it actually grow so big? Most of the sources on the internet say that it grows only to about 5 cm![]() This would be about 2 in. |
| Joe Potato | Oh, you're right. I saw "Brilliant Rasbora" and assumed it was Rasbora einthoveni. I should have checked the scientific name first. I've never seen R. borapetensis be referred to as "Brilliant Rasbora", always as "Blackline Rasbora". Good catch, Gaia. |
| Babelfish | Reject Poor joe, getting rejected. Sokay me spudy we still love you boiled in oil... |
| Doedogg | Reject |
| longhairedgit | Reject |

I've never seen R. borapetensis be referred to as "Brilliant Rasbora", always as "Blackline Rasbora". Good catch, Gaia.