Review Proposed Changes
Profile: | Ancistrus sp. | ||
Field: | size | ||
Status: | Rejected | ||
Votes: | -7 | ||
Submitter: | T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | ||
Reason: | My males have already reached, and are continuing growing from, 16cm and the females are holding steady at an average of 14cm. This could just be due to a variance in teh exact species, but I just thought it good to highlight this. | ||
Old Text: | Males: 12;12cm (4.7") Females: cm (0") | New Text: | Males: 16;14cm (6.3") Females: cm (0") |
Votes | ||
Member | Vote | Weight |
T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | Neutral | 0 |
Natalie | Reject | -2 |
sirbooks | Reject | -3 |
mrwizerd | Reject | -2 |
Total: -7 |
Comments | |
T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | My males have already reached, and are continuing growing from, 16cm and the females are holding steady at an average of 14cm. This could just be due to a variance in teh exact species, but I just thought it good to highlight this. |
Posted 12-Jun-2006 14:56 | |
T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | Sorry, but there is a spelling mistake. I wrote 'teh exact species' rather than 'the exact species'. Apologies. Tarky |
Posted 14-Jun-2006 09:44 | |
sirbooks | Can you confirm that they are not a described species of Ancistrus, and just represent the pool of unknowns? |
Posted 15-Jun-2006 19:18 | |
T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | Sorry, but I can't. |
Posted 16-Jun-2006 16:38 | |
Natalie | Also, the lengths given for fish in these profiles is standard lenths, which is used in most books and scientific literature. A fish that is 12cm standard length might be 16cm total length. How were you measuring yours? |
Posted 17-Jun-2006 20:48 | |
T'Ark'An'Ni Ak'Kan | From the tip of their snout to the end of their tails. |
Posted 18-Jun-2006 04:32 | |
sirbooks | Reject Then that is going to be total length. |
Posted 18-Jun-2006 16:05 | |
Natalie | Reject |
Posted 18-Jun-2006 20:39 | |
mrwizerd | Reject |
Posted 22-Jun-2006 05:22 |