FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
I'm wondering if I would want a bottom feeder | |
jakemmy Fingerling Posts: 19 Kudos: 6 Votes: 0 Registered: 13-Mar-2007 | I have a 16 gallon, and read the previous posts. I have 1 angel (it's small), 2 livebearers, one mini gourami, and 3 neons. I know, I'm alittle overstocked. Anyway, I have diatrams (spelled right) and can't get rid of them off the gravel. The walls and plants are free, as I reliogiously clean them. Would a small bottom feeder do me good? I want to have him happy though. Thanks, Anne |
Posted 26-Apr-2007 22:54 | |
So_Very_Sneaky Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 3238 Kudos: 2272 Votes: 201 Registered: 10-Mar-2004 | Hi there, Considering your tank is overstocked as is, i wouldnt add any more fish. You are aware I hope that you cannot keep an adult angelfish in a 16 gallon tank? Angelfish grow to be 8 inches from snout to ba tail, and up to 14 inches tall in Finnage. They need a minimum sized tank of 24 inches long by 12 inches wide by 18 inches deep - a 25 gallon tall. Keeping Angels in small tanks stunts their growth, and they will usually only live 3-5 years once stunted, which is a puny amount of time for a fish that if properly cared for can easily live 20 years. If you got rid of the angelfish, you could add 3 more neons, and a group of bottom feeders - like 6 cory cats or 3 kuhli loaches or similar. Come Play Yahtzee With Me! http://games.atari.com Http://www.myleague.com/yahtgames |
Posted 27-Apr-2007 00:11 | |
longhairedgit Fish Guru Lord of the Beasts Posts: 2502 Kudos: 1778 Votes: 29 Registered: 21-Aug-2005 | Diatomic algae is down to the presence of silicates anyway, its not an issue that is solved by scavenging species. Most algae eaters cannot derive nutriment from it, and only water changes and the natural erosion of gravels really affects the outcome of how much diatomic algae you have. When the diatomic algae runs out of the raw materials to form their structures with only then does it subside. If in a case like mine where I have a lot of quartz gravel, you just have to get used to it, it does subside with time as the tiny particles from the gravel are finallty removed by many months of water changes, and the looser surface areas are eroded away. Silicates do not naturally fade, they can only be removed, so do a big scrape, and then an water immediate change while much of the diatomic algae is suspended in the water. If you just scrape it off and dont remove it, it will be back time and again, infinitely recycled, unless picked up slowly by the filter and dumped when you clean the media. |
Posted 27-Apr-2007 00:58 | |
jasonpisani *Ultimate Fish Guru* Posts: 5553 Kudos: 7215 Votes: 1024 Registered: 24-Feb-2003 | If you already know that you're overstocked, then why add more fish?. I think it's more efficiant to make water changes & consider what So_Very_Sneaky said. http://www.flickr.com/photos/corydoras/ Member of the Malta Aquarist Society - 1970. http://www.maltaaquarist.com |
Posted 27-Apr-2007 18:48 | |
So_Very_Sneaky Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 3238 Kudos: 2272 Votes: 201 Registered: 10-Mar-2004 | Yep, most common solution to Diatoms is water changes, water changes and more water changes. Suck it up and get it out. Maybe you need to clean your gravel more often. Are you using a gravel vaccuum and vaccuuming 50% of the gravel once weekly? Reduce feeding, reduce stock, water changes, are all solutions to Diatoms. Come Play Yahtzee With Me! http://games.atari.com Http://www.myleague.com/yahtgames |
Posted 27-Apr-2007 23:07 |
Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies