FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
![]() | Rineloricaria ID |
inkodinkomalinko![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Guru Posts: 2441 Kudos: 833 Registered: 18-Jan-2003 ![]() ![]() | I picked up two Rineloricarias labelled as "Loricaria Lanceolatas". Just wanted someone to confirm the ID as Rineloricaria lanceolata? Thanks! http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v146/Killerhobofish/SSL10009.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v146/Killerhobofish/SSL10007.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v146/Killerhobofish/SSL10005.jpg |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Natalie![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ultimate Fish Guru Apolay Wayyioy Posts: 4499 Kudos: 3730 Votes: 348 Registered: 01-Feb-2003 ![]() ![]() ![]() | I'm not too good at identifying Loricariids, but that's definitely not a Rineloricaria lanceolata. It kind of just looks like regular old Rineloricaria fallax to me, but there are a few other species that look similar (and I can't really tell the difference between them). ![]() I'm not your neighbor, you Bakersfield trash. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cup_of_Lifenoodles![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Guru Posts: 2755 Kudos: 1957 Votes: 30 Registered: 09-Sep-2004 ![]() ![]() | R. eigenmanni. Both fallax and lanceolata, contrary to popular belief, are rather infrequent imports, and 9 times out of ten, any rineloricaria purchased at an LFS is going to be R. eigenmanni. Though, with a range extending through all the popular llanos collection sites, who can blame them? |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Natalie![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ultimate Fish Guru Apolay Wayyioy Posts: 4499 Kudos: 3730 Votes: 348 Registered: 01-Feb-2003 ![]() ![]() ![]() | Doesn't Rineloricaria eigenmanni have barring on the underside of its caudal peduncle? The fish pictured does not appear to have any significant ventral pigmentation. ![]() I'm not your neighbor, you Bakersfield trash. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cup_of_Lifenoodles![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Guru Posts: 2755 Kudos: 1957 Votes: 30 Registered: 09-Sep-2004 ![]() ![]() | Doubtful; it depends greatly on the catching locailty and the condition of the fish; there is definitely striping there. How dark it is remains to be seen, as the fish is obivisouly greatly stressed. I actually had an in depth discussion on the variation of the species in question with Shane Linder, who conceded that, as with all other loricariines (whiptails), color change is eminent amongst rineloricaria (though nothing in comparison, with, say, pseudohemiodon, or the better known chameleons of the subfamily). Facial and fin markings are a far better for identification, as they tend to fade away less noticably as opposed to those along the flank. Several of the fish originally classified as various "Panara [insert numeral]" were group together under r. eigenmanni, not all of which bear strong transverse markings. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
inkodinkomalinko![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Guru Posts: 2441 Kudos: 833 Registered: 18-Jan-2003 ![]() ![]() | Thanks for the id! |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() | |
Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies