FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
![]() | OZ angelfish |
bettachris![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 3875 Kudos: 4173 Votes: 452 Registered: 13-Jun-2004 ![]() ![]() | their is some1 on another site from aUS, etc.. we are haveing a disagreement, (katie knows) she promises me that i am wrong b/c i am talking about scalere angels, and she is telling me that their are Austraian angels that are maxed at 4 inches.[img src='/images/forums/halo.gif' border=0] the only think i can think of is the long nosed angel, but an Austrailian angel. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
keithgh![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *Ultimate Fish Guru* Posts: 6371 Kudos: 6918 Votes: 1542 Registered: 26-Apr-2003 ![]() ![]() ![]() | I am certainly no expert but I am sure there is no native FW fish in Aust by that name. There are several SW fish on the Great Barrier Reef that have a commom similar names. Some selective breading could have been done with imported fish thus giving them the Aust name. Keith ![]() ![]() Near enough is not good enough, therefore good enough is not near enough, and only your best will do. I VOTE DO YOU if not WHY NOT? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ACIDRAIN![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Moderator Posts: 3162 Kudos: 1381 Votes: 416 Registered: 14-Jan-2002 ![]() ![]() ![]() | Probably talking SW. As there are many angels native to the Australian SW waters. There is always a bigger fish... |
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() | |
Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies