FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
I think they are? SAE | |
elilk Small Fry Posts: 6 Kudos: 3 Votes: 3 Registered: 11-Mar-2008 | |
Posted 27-Feb-2009 08:00 | |
keithgh *Ultimate Fish Guru* Posts: 6371 Kudos: 6918 Votes: 1542 Registered: 26-Apr-2003 | Having had SAEs for many years I would say a definite yes. One of the main reason is the dark line that goes into the tail. I dont know if you have been told they are fantastic algae eaters while they are younger but as soon as they get old and bigger they seem to get lazy and prefer to eat given food. That does not mean that is all they eat but they prefer given foods. Have a look in [link=My Profile] http://www.fishprofiles.com/forums/member.aspx?id=1935[/link] for my tank info Look here for my Betta 11Gal Desktop & Placidity 5ft Community Tank Photos Keith Near enough is not good enough, therefore good enough is not near enough, and only your best will do. I VOTE DO YOU if not WHY NOT? VOTE NOW VOTE NOW |
Posted 27-Feb-2009 10:03 | |
elilk Small Fry Posts: 6 Kudos: 3 Votes: 3 Registered: 11-Mar-2008 | That's awsome, thanks keith! I have heard they get lazy when they're older but hopefully by then my plants will be out competing the algae... Anyway I'll still love them, they're very cute. By the way you guys on this forum are very helpful and fast to respond, It's great to have questions answered by people who aren't selling stuff to you. Hopefully I'll be able to contribute a bit but I'm pretty new to fish so we'll see. Cheers |
Posted 27-Feb-2009 13:46 | |
Calilasseia *Ultimate Fish Guru* Panda Funster Posts: 5496 Kudos: 2828 Votes: 731 Registered: 10-Feb-2003 | Your photos depict fishes that look almost exactly the way my SAEs looked when they were first purchased about 2 years ago. Mind you, they look a bit different now, because they're now 5 inches long and have piled on some body mass in that time, which means they're a bit chunkier looking than yours! Oh, they are excellent algae eaters, but they have a habit of concentrating their attention on algal growths in the lower regions of the aquarium, so if you need an algal control for the top la Oddly enough, mine don't seem to be particularly lazy as adults, though they're a little less energetic than they were as juveniles. Mine haven't yet gone into comfy chair and slippers mode like Keith's! |
Posted 02-Mar-2009 09:09 | |
Callatya Moderator The girl's got crabs! Posts: 9662 Kudos: 5261 Registered: 16-Sep-2001 | What is the red mark above the black line? |
Posted 02-Mar-2009 19:59 | |
Calilasseia *Ultimate Fish Guru* Panda Funster Posts: 5496 Kudos: 2828 Votes: 731 Registered: 10-Feb-2003 | Funny you should mention that Callatya, only I re-checked my photos of my past specimens from 1999, and one of those had a dull brick-coloured mark above the red line too. Here's the photo: |
Posted 07-Mar-2009 01:36 | |
Callatya Moderator The girl's got crabs! Posts: 9662 Kudos: 5261 Registered: 16-Sep-2001 | That is very interesting indeed. Do you have any pictures of older fish? I don't think mine were that young when I bought them and I don't remember noticing that colour, so I'm curious if it is an age thing or perhaps regional variation or something. |
Posted 07-Mar-2009 18:06 | |
Calilasseia *Ultimate Fish Guru* Panda Funster Posts: 5496 Kudos: 2828 Votes: 731 Registered: 10-Feb-2003 | Just took a quick squint at my 5 inch monsters in their swamp tank with the Flag Fish - the brick red mark isn't visible on any of them at adult size, at least not on my three. Trouble is, the photos I have of them are problematic with respect to quality, thanks to the tendency of my digital camera to add noise speckles to images if I don't carpet bomb the scene with flashlight, and the position of the SAEs' aquarium makes photography a job for a gynmast of Mary Lou Retton's prowess! Plus, the images I do have are huge - 2048 1536 or thereabouts - and I'd have to do a LOT of work in PhotoShop to reduce them to a manageable size for em However, here's a shot of my current three taken back in 2007, when they were juveniles, and at that time, they too lacked the brick red mark, so I think it's probably a matter of either individual or geographical variation: |
Posted 09-Mar-2009 07:12 |
Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies