FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
| faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
| will this fit rule | |
greenmonkey51![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Master Posts: 1571 Kudos: 1692 Votes: 5 Registered: 28-Jan-2004 ![]() | i think i have found rule after many observations. the minimum tank size for fish Length- tank length x adult fish length= 4x adult fish length Width- tank width x adult fish length= 1.5x adult fish length there are obvious exceptions but would this be a good general rule |
keithgh![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *Ultimate Fish Guru* Posts: 6371 Kudos: 6918 Votes: 1542 Registered: 26-Apr-2003 ![]() | greenmonkey51 I have never followed any "Rule" all I have ever used is just old fashion "Common Sense" A Q for you, Have you formed this formula on the smooth & flat surface area. I recently saw on TV News a container for gold fish. It was recessed into the floor it appeared to be about 6ins deep and 3ft wide but 20+++ ft in length. I know this is the exception how would you rule apply here. Also the tall tanks this rule would not apply. If any thing I would go by volume, filtration, water movement, surface movement ( air stones etc) Keith ![]() ![]() Near enough is not good enough, therefore good enough is not near enough, and only your best will do. I VOTE DO YOU if not WHY NOT? VOTE NOW ![]() VOTE NOW ![]() |
greenmonkey51![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fish Master Posts: 1571 Kudos: 1692 Votes: 5 Registered: 28-Jan-2004 ![]() | this isn't a rule as much as a guide to help people |
| Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies













VOTE NOW