Review Proposed Changes

Profile:	Cabomba
Field:	pH
Status:	Rejected
Votes:	-10
Submitter:	GobyFan2007
Reason:	got screwed up last time. Found that it actually will tolerate more acidic waters, but wont grow as successfully. more alkaline waters wont be tolerated as well.
Old Text:	6.40000009536743;7.40000009536743	New Text:	6.400000095367433;7.400000095367432

Comments
GobyFan2007	got screwed up last time. Found that it actually will tolerate more acidic waters, but wont grow as successfully. more alkaline waters wont be tolerated as well.
Posted 15-Mar-2007 21:22
Babelfish	Approve
Posted 16-Mar-2007 11:30
LITTLE_FISH	Reject Nah, As I stated in the initial "New Profile Created Thread", the ph was a sticky point. I believe the listed range to be way to narrow, in particular the low scale entry seems to be way to high. Albeit I usually don't like to link out to make my point, here are a few references: - This one is from The Washington State Department of Ecology, in particular the phrase "Habitat: Favors ponds, lakes, and quiet streams with low pH" is of interest here. - And This One Here is from a site that deals more with plants and usually serves as a great reference for plant profiles. Note the low end of the ph level at 4.8. Ingo
Posted 16-Mar-2007 13:36
djrichie	Reject
Posted 20-Mar-2007 02:20
kitten	Reject Doing a quick bit of research, I see that the vneral range for pH seems to be more like 4-7. Not sure where you got the figures above, but just browsing through a few sites gives a wider range of pH than you have indicated.
Posted 21-Mar-2007 04:33
Doedogg	Reject
Posted 21-Mar-2007 18:33
So_Very_Sneaky	Reject
Posted 22-Mar-2007 01:01
zachf92	Reject
Posted 22-Mar-2007 21:15
Adam	Reject
Posted 23-Mar-2007 02:12