FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
playing around with new camera (load warning) | |
Jason_R_S Moderator Posts: 2811 Kudos: 2421 Votes: 391 Registered: 18-Apr-2001 | Today I decided I was sick of taking terrible pics of my fish with my cheap camera, so I splurged on a Kodak 7530 5.0 MP. Here are some of the first pics I got with it. A. robertsoni (female I believe ~4.5-5" Festae (Red Terror) pair Male festae ~7" Male festae again, looking out of a cave/rock formation where the pair have previously spawned twice. Female festae ~5.5" and small convict in background (I was so eager to try the new camera, I forgot to clean the glass first:%)) Arrowhead puffer ~4" [/font][/font][/font][/font][/font][/font] [span class="edited"][Edited by jason_r_s 2004-08-25 01:15][/span] |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:24 | |
keithgh *Ultimate Fish Guru* Posts: 6371 Kudos: 6918 Votes: 1542 Registered: 26-Apr-2003 | Jason Excellent photos all round. Have a close look and you can see the water marks on the glass. That is the trouble having a good camera it picks up every thing. I was having little dots pinpoint size in my photo I cleaned the glass both sides but still marks. I had a look at the out side of the glass from a side view and there they were. Water spots, these stains took me a long time to remove them with soft kitchen paper and metho. Have you tried any Macro shots yet? Keith Near enough is not good enough, therefore good enough is not near enough, and only your best will do. I VOTE DO YOU if not WHY NOT? VOTE NOW VOTE NOW |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:24 | |
Jason_R_S Moderator Posts: 2811 Kudos: 2421 Votes: 391 Registered: 18-Apr-2001 | Thanks! I know about the water marks...I was too excited to try out the camera and forgot to clean the glass first:%) Don't know about macro options yet for this camera. I'm still playing around with it and trying to get the hang of it. Jason |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:24 | |
tommyc Hobbyist Posts: 106 Kudos: 1146 Votes: 75 Registered: 11-Aug-2003 | Great shots I am in the same boat trying to take fish shots with my canon zr45 camcorder quality awfull. Jason, if you don't mind me asking what type of $$ would that model run as I am in the market. |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:24 | |
Babelfish Administrator Small Fry with Ketchup Posts: 6833 Kudos: 8324 Votes: 1570 Registered: 17-Apr-2003 | had a look @them jason congrats on the new camera, pretty decent quality for a kodak (I'll hold my other comments ). Were you shooting with macro? if not I'd suggest it . and *lobs teeny-tiny handfull of purple gravel in celebration* ^_^ |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:24 | |
keithgh *Ultimate Fish Guru* Posts: 6371 Kudos: 6918 Votes: 1542 Registered: 26-Apr-2003 | Jason All my photos are taken on "Auto" There are several reason the main reason is I have not finished my Dr at uni yet on how to read and understand a digital camera instruction manual. Secondly I just do not know how to adjust all the bits corectly for the reason above. Finally as was explained to me by a professional photographer "The good camera makers have spent millions developing the (Auto) system so why not use it. Any/most alterations can be done an a good computer program" Keith Near enough is not good enough, therefore good enough is not near enough, and only your best will do. I VOTE DO YOU if not WHY NOT? VOTE NOW VOTE NOW |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:24 | |
Jason_R_S Moderator Posts: 2811 Kudos: 2421 Votes: 391 Registered: 18-Apr-2001 | thanks. this camera has several built in settings. i've gotten the best pics so far with the 'close-up' setting (which I noticed has a tulip). I've gotten through part of the manual so far. Jason ps. glass is cleaner on the new pics |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:24 |
Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies