FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
Is T5 lighting any better than normal lighting? | |
Troy_Mclure Fish Addict Posts: 725 Kudos: 306 Registered: 20-Jan-2003 | I ask as I just bought a 4x39 watt T5 enclosure with reflector. its going onto a 75g tank. Is this going to give out more light than a normal fluro tube? |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 07:45 | |
FRANK Moderator Posts: 5108 Kudos: 5263 Votes: 1690 Registered: 28-Dec-2002 | Hi, You don't say what brand reflector you have purchased so we cannot look it up and read the specifics about that unit. Generally speaking, 4x39=156watts/75G= 2.08 watts per gallon(wpg) That gives you enough light for the low light demand plants and many of the medium light demand plants. Since T-5 bulbs are 5/8 inch in diameter and your enclosure holds 4 of them thats roughly 2.5 inches of bulbs. Normal fluorescent bulbs are T-8 or T-12 meaning that the diameter is one inch, and inch and a half in diameter. The Normal fluorescent bulb is 40 watts max and a similar hood that held normal fluorescents would only hold two bulbs or 80 watts giving you less than a watt and a half. That would restrict you to barely having enough light for some low light plants. If the tank is a show tank, a "tall" tank, then you might think about using the higher "K" rating bulbs, perhaps as high as 10,000K. That will give you more energy reaching the substrate surface than the lower "K" rating bulbs. Frank -->>> The Confidence of Amateurs, is the Envy of Professionals <<<-- |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 11:33 | |
sham Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 3369 Kudos: 2782 Votes: 98 Registered: 21-Apr-2004 | T5s are generally considered to give out the most lumens per watt aside from maybe MH. That means it will count as slightly more light than NO fluorescents and even than compacts. The reason compact bulbs are more popular is that T5s have to be replaced very frequently, are expensive, and produce alot of heat. A T5 bulb should be replaced every 6months at least and some suggest every 4months where compact bulbs can last a year or slightly over. Marine aquarists with money to burn really seem to like T5s though since they do put out more light than other fluorescents. |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 19:40 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Got your facts wrong sham T5 bulbs last longer and run cooler than than PC(alot! believe me I have both). On a reef tank I'd switch PC bulbs at 10 months if I could afford it. T5's run cooler (aren't doubled over on themselves) and therefore run more efficiently and last longer. I've seen great coral growth on T5 bulbs that were 18 months old. Most T5s will still have a large percent of output until they fail. Also, the reason they "put out more light" compared to a power compact is because of how skinny the bulb is. When a reflector is made individually for a T5 bulb it more closely resembles a parabola than with power compacts. This means more light is reflected into the water than back into the bulb, also creating less heat. The actual bulb probably doesn't put out much more light than a power compact. That is why it is crucial to get a fixture with individual parabolic reflectors for each bulb rather than one large reflector. With individual parabolic reflectors, T5s can easily double or more the light output per watt of a compact fluorescent. I'd also like to add that I had 2x96w PC on my 30G reef tank and switched to T5s. I've finally figured out that even 4x39 watt T5s are too much light. I simply have 2 39W bulbs over a reef tank with healthy thriving corals. That's less than 3 watts per gallon. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 01:35 | |
Troy_Mclure Fish Addict Posts: 725 Kudos: 306 Registered: 20-Jan-2003 | ok forgot to look at the light when I got home but I looked at the online ebay store I bought it from. its a sun sun HFL-1200. The tank is 2ft tall. Does this count as a 'tall tank'? Oh yeah and thanks for the info guys. |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 01:56 | |
FRANK Moderator Posts: 5108 Kudos: 5263 Votes: 1690 Registered: 28-Dec-2002 | Hi Troy, Yes two feet deep is a "tall" tank in that the light has to pass through nearly two feet of water before it reaches the substrate. That amount of water can scatter the light and absorb some of the energy. The bulbs sound like they would be good. Frank -->>> The Confidence of Amateurs, is the Envy of Professionals <<<-- |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 08:09 | |
Troy_Mclure Fish Addict Posts: 725 Kudos: 306 Registered: 20-Jan-2003 | I am really looking forward to planting this tank. While Im here, is there any suggestions on a Co2 set up? I usually rig up a cokebottle with sugar and yeast on my 30 gal tank but this is a bit bigger. If I were to go to proper Co2 injection, how long do the gas bottles last? |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 08:36 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | I would recommend you go with pressurized on a larger tank like a 75. With a couple or 3 bubbles per second the CO2 tank will last a few months, give or take. You can get the tank at a local welding supply store, and the regulator I would recommend would be a milwuakee regulator. Many of us use those with good results. They can be found all over the place on-line. I actually have an LFS good enough that got one in for me (cheaper for me because I work there, might be cheaper for you to shop online). Oh, I also wanted to make clear that I was talking about T5HO lighting being brighter than power compacts when used withproper individual parabolic reflectors. I believe though that you can only get 39w bulbs as T5HO 3ft bulbs. So that should all apply to you, the bulbs should just be offset, so the center will be a little brighter. That would be my guess. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 16:17 | |
FRANK Moderator Posts: 5108 Kudos: 5263 Votes: 1690 Registered: 28-Dec-2002 | Hi, The general rule of thumb seems to be a 30G cutoff for using DIY CO2 injection. Larger tanks require more coke bottles in series, and many more waiting in reserve. Then you add your own schedule into the mix and the CO2 in the tank goes up and down as family schedules get in the way of keeping the bottles mixed, fresh, and connected. In short, it turns into a real CHORE. The plants suffer too as they shift between feast and famine. When you first set up your bottled system a good safe start is with one bubble per second and watch your pH. (An electronic pH monitor is an excellent investment at this point) Watch the CO2 saturation (pH vs KH readings) for 12 to 24 hours and then adjust up to 2 bubbles, and wait, etc. In other words adjust slowly over time watching the pH/KH readings till you get to about 30mg/l CO2 saturation. My 5 pound bottle lasts for about 6 months at 2 bubbles per second and costs 10$ plus tax to refill. Frank -->>> The Confidence of Amateurs, is the Envy of Professionals <<<-- |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 17:05 | |
sham Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 3369 Kudos: 2782 Votes: 98 Registered: 21-Apr-2004 | Then all the people I've talked to are wrong because I've always been told to replace T5s within at least 6months and that they produce tons of heat. It's the 2 most common reasons I see people state for choosing PC over T5. Despite the fact all the people I see using them say they put out more and better light than PCs. |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 17:29 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Dunno if all the people you have talked to have read this thread. I suggest you do. When you read all 260 pages come on back and we'll talk. This here's from a guy who sells and uses ALL kinds of bulbs and has done so for years, so he knows more than you and me. Originally posted by Aquactinics I know it's just one guy, but if you read the thread there are quite a few people who agree and not too many that disagree. My bulbs personally have been running for 7 months. I'll let you know how they are doing a year from now. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 21:58 |
Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies