AquaRank.com

FishProfiles.com Message Forums

faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox
# FishProfiles.com Message Forums
L# General
 L# Technical Tinkering
  L# Lighting Question - Yes another one.
 Post Reply  New Topic
SubscribeLighting Question - Yes another one.
tetratech
----------
Ultimate Fish Guru
Posts: 4241
Kudos: 1074
Registered: 04-Nov-2003
male usa


I have a 46 gallon S.A. tank. The only plants right now
are Wisteria, java fern and java moss. All lower light.

I've been having a problem with algae attaching itself to these plants and causing many of the leaves to fall off or not grow well.

Here's my lighting situation.

I have a Current USA fixture that can hold 2 96watt bulbs.
I currently have three bulbs available that I could use.

They are:

96watt dual daylight 6,700/10,000k
96watt coralife 6,700k
96watt dual Actinic 420nm/460nm

Which combination of bulbs would be best for my current plants & algae currently and which would be best if I got
higher light plants.

I think I will be told that the 96watt 6700k bulb is good for my current situation and anything else would be overkill. Although I do like the way the Actinic looks at night with the other bulb off.

And if I get higher light plants I should use the 6,700k and the 6700k/10,000k bulbs for a total of 192 watts.

By the way my tank is about 20inches deep and I have eco-complete as a substrate. Again my big problem has been algae (hairish) on my plant leaves and all over my javamoss

Thank you in advance for your response.


My Scapes
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:40Profile PM Edit Report 
FRANK
 
**********
---------------
---------------
Moderator
Posts: 5108
Kudos: 5263
Votes: 1690
Registered: 28-Dec-2002
male usa us-colorado
Hi,
I would use either of the 6700K bulbs and chuck the
third. The dual bulb might be interesting. The
wisteria will take off I suspect, and the other two
will just keep "plodding along." The other two are
slow growers, and nothing will make them go any faster.

Frank


-->>> The Confidence of Amateurs, is the Envy of Professionals <<<--
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:40Profile PM Edit Delete Report 
tetratech
----------
Ultimate Fish Guru
Posts: 4241
Kudos: 1074
Registered: 04-Nov-2003
male usa
Thanks much Frank. Is there any downside to using the actintic bulb at night just for the effect.

Thanks again!

My Scapes
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:40Profile PM Edit Delete Report 
NowherMan6
**********
---------------
-----
Fish Master
Posts: 1880
Kudos: 922
Votes: 69
Registered: 21-Jun-2004
male usa
2 96 watt bulbs? So that basically gives you a little over 4wpg on your 46 gallon tank. that's a lot.

Are you running CO2 on this tank? I get the feeling that your algae problems are caused by a high amount of light and a limited amount of CO2 for the plants. The lack of carbon is inhibiting the plants' ability to grow and use up excess nutrients and put all that light to good use, so algae is stepping in and making fine use of it. There's only so much light a plant can use without a proportionate amount of carbon and other elements. Prune the most affected leaves and get yourself some pressurized CO2. The wisteria will probably explode.

As for the type of lights, I've read and heard that actinic lighting is pretty useless for a planted tank, but I'll defer to Frank, our resident plant expert, on that one...


Back in the saddle!
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:40Profile PM Edit Delete Report 
tetratech
----------
Ultimate Fish Guru
Posts: 4241
Kudos: 1074
Registered: 04-Nov-2003
male usa
Thanks nowherman6,

I'm not using Co2, because I originally was going to go with a heavily planted tank that's why I got the light, but I have an angel that is pretty destructive, so I decided to go with more driftwood and put some plants in that would look nice with it, but the algae thing has been a real bummer.

I guess I'll go back to only 96w total, prune alot and keep up water changes.

My Scapes
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:40Profile PM Edit Delete Report 
Azn_Devil
********
-----
Big Fish
Posts: 366
Kudos: 310
Votes: 5
Registered: 30-Apr-2004
male
if i were you, i wouldve given the angel back to the store for either a refund or for free and take advantage of the high amount of light. It just seems like such a huge waste. 192W total lighting and so little plants
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:40Profile PM Edit Delete Report 
FRANK
 
**********
---------------
---------------
Moderator
Posts: 5108
Kudos: 5263
Votes: 1690
Registered: 28-Dec-2002
male usa us-colorado
Hi,
I think what you are looking for is something that will
simulate moonlight. They have specific lighting now
available for that. In fact you can purchase a one
or two tube flourscent hood that also contains "moonlights"
and when the daylights go out, the moonlights come on.

Actinic will not work for what you want. You have to
give both fish and plants some "night time" in which
to cycle (rest).

Frank


-->>> The Confidence of Amateurs, is the Envy of Professionals <<<--
Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:40Profile PM Edit Delete Report 
Babelfish
 
**********
---------------
---------------
---------------
Administrator
Small Fry with Ketchup
Posts: 6833
Kudos: 8324
Votes: 1570
Registered: 17-Apr-2003
female australia us-maryland
I think part of you're algae problem would be the fact that you're not going with the CO2. The excess nutrients and light are being absorbed by the algae rather than the plants. I'd still go for adding the CO2 and either exchange the angel, move it to another tank, or just add more tough plants. I'd think java fern and some of the other hardies should be able to withstand an angel.

As for the bulbs, 67K all the way :88). Make sure you've replaced them if they're over a year or so old.

^_^ [hr width='40%']
"The rain is falling down like silence in a shroud"


Post InfoPosted 26-Jan-2006 11:40Profile Homepage AIM MSN PM Edit Delete Report 
Post Reply  New Topic
Jump to: 

The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.

FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies