FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
Quarentine tank substrate | |
greenmonkey51 Fish Master Posts: 1571 Kudos: 1692 Votes: 5 Registered: 28-Jan-2004 | Im going to switch my 20g long to a quarentine tank. Im wondering if I should leave the substrate in. It would be easier to clean. |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:26 | |
Babelfish Administrator Small Fry with Ketchup Posts: 6833 Kudos: 8324 Votes: 1570 Registered: 17-Apr-2003 | I'd suggest keeping only a small ammount of substrate in a q-tine tank. Remember anytime you end up with a serious illness you're going to want to sterilize the substrate or throw it away. I wouldn't go much more than one inch deep. So long as your current substrate is disease free it should be just fine to leave a small ammount of it in for q-tine purposes. If you have more substrate in there now it can be removed, washed well and put away for later. ^_^ [hr width='40%'] It only hurts when I breathe" |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:26 | |
FRANK Moderator Posts: 5108 Kudos: 5263 Votes: 1690 Registered: 28-Dec-2002 | Hi, I'm not sure why you would put substrate in a "QTank." As Babel mentioned, many times the medications used will kill off any bacterial colonies in the gravel. Additionally, many of the critters that we are trying to eliminate through the use of the QTank will simply "hibernate" snugly in the gravel till the tank is occupied again. The addition of an inch of gravel in a 10G tank for instance, means that there is not 10G of water in the tank, and that will throw off your calculations for how much medication, if any, to add. Normally, any QTank is bare bottomed and simply uses an inside sponge filter. Yes, there can be a difference between a QTank and a Hospital tank, but generally speaking the same tank is used for both purposes either at the same time, or at different times. Bare is better. It is far easier to disinfect after use, and easier to make accurate calculations for medications. Frank Last edited by FRANK at 14-Apr-2005 09:35 -->>> The Confidence of Amateurs, is the Envy of Professionals <<<-- |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:26 | |
keithgh *Ultimate Fish Guru* Posts: 6371 Kudos: 6918 Votes: 1542 Registered: 26-Apr-2003 | greenmonkey51 I have never owned a quarentine tank, but what I know of them, they are always just the bare glass. By doing this you are not leaving any nasties in the ba Keith Near enough is not good enough, therefore good enough is not near enough, and only your best will do. I VOTE DO YOU if not WHY NOT? VOTE NOW VOTE NOW |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:26 | |
jasonpisani *Ultimate Fish Guru* Posts: 5553 Kudos: 7215 Votes: 1024 Registered: 24-Feb-2003 | I think it's better to leave it bare. Personally i don't own one, but i always heard that it's easier to clean & better health wise. http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/s8xi5heh/my_photos http://www.deathbydyeing.org/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/corydoras/ Member of the Malta Aquarist Society - 1970. http://www.maltaaquarist.com |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:26 | |
Babelfish Administrator Small Fry with Ketchup Posts: 6833 Kudos: 8324 Votes: 1570 Registered: 17-Apr-2003 | There are some cases where you want substrate. I'd think most bottom feeders would be quite upset @not having some ammount of substrate. Ottos especially spring to mind. But the above reasons are all very valid. Personal preferance on my part is that it be set up to make the fish as happy as possible. If that means throwing out the substrate or needing to make extra calculations when dosing meds if needed, then so be it. Even with hospital tanks (sometimes the same as your q-tine tank but not always) you sometimes add some gravel and or decor to help calm the fish. ^_^ [hr width='40%'] It only hurts when I breathe" |
Posted 26-Jan-2006 11:26 |
Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies