FishProfiles.com Message Forums |
faq | etiquette | register | my account | search | mailbox |
LITTLE_FISH 29G Log | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | O.K. so this tank has been up an running for over a year an now your getting thread algae. What's changed? It's lowlightish, etc. BTW - This tank is dying for some shrimp to walk around and keep it clean, especially that java moss plateau. My Scapes |
Posted 24-Sep-2006 11:59 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Tetratech, Are you still up or are you up again? This is early, man Anyway, nothing much at all has changed in this tank ever since the complete makeover on July 4th. BTW, this is Xmas Moss and not the cheap stuff The moss occasionally showed problems throughout the duration of the tank, always when it reached a point where it required trimming. I remember that a couple of months back I had la I simply think the moss got too thick and collected waist and uneaten food, as well as having a rotting la Ingo |
Posted 24-Sep-2006 12:07 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | this is Xmas Moss and not the cheap stuff Well, excuse me! Yeah, I just woke up, been getting up early like 4:30 since I pulled those almost all-nighters. Anyway like I said find yourself half dozen amanos/yamatos and everyday will be xmas for them in that moss. Going for a quick bike ride, but I'll be back. My Scapes |
Posted 24-Sep-2006 12:51 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Well, It is 4 weeks since my last entry and not too much has changes in this tank with regards to plants used and fish, except that all was going downhill a little. I added quite a bit of duckweed to the tank a few weeks back. The purpose was to shade the tank a little so that maybe the tenellus grows taller (as I assume it is so short because of the rather strong light) and to eradicate the algae on the moss. Well, neither nor worked, but instead I created problems with my crypts: The long and floating leaves of the hygro caused the duckweed to stay static on the left side and eventually covered the entire surface above the whole left half of the tank. This greatly limited the light to the crypts and not only did they change their color from brownish to greenish but they also started to melt. Here is a look at that side of the tank: I Am Melting |
Posted 22-Oct-2006 11:44 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | On top of it, even the removal of the moss from the wood and the attempt to place only really healthy parts back onto it (a few weeks back as well) did not work out. Here is a closer look at the moss this weekend. Once can clearly see the stringy algae (staghorn, I assume) all over it. The same algae, but more bunched up, is now also in various spots anchored in the tenellus. Also, you can see two of my platies that are a mix of the red and the yellow ones: Moss - Algae |
Posted 22-Oct-2006 11:47 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Luckily, I am redoing my 125 this weekend and I was able to replace the hygro with a new batch from that tank. I made sure that it is short enough not to break the surface and I also reduced the amount of duckweed. I used tweezers to pull out as much of the algae on the moss as I can. Have fun, Ingo Here is the result after the trimming and water change: This Weekend |
Posted 22-Oct-2006 11:50 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Well, it is official, something is out of whack in this tank, and I have no idea what it could be (except the lack of ferts, ). This tank has maintained itself nicely until I replaced the gravel with the Eco. I assume Eco leaches some stuff, albeit minor, into the water column and that throws my pretty much non-existing fertilizer routine off. Here is a shot of the Tenellus group: Tenellus Group |
Posted 29-Oct-2006 13:11 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | That doesn't look all that bad, but a closer look reveals the algae that is spreading in and between the individual plants. It seems to be mostly of the kind that also grows on the Xmas moss, but more dense (I assume this is related to the fact that it is further away from the light): Closer Look |
Posted 29-Oct-2006 13:13 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | The moss in itself developed much more algae within the last week then it did in the two weeks before that. Here is the whole "log" with moss and algae: Xmas Algae |
Posted 29-Oct-2006 13:14 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Last shot, a closer look at the most dense spot of algae in the Xmas moss. I spent as much time as I could to manually pull out the algae strings from the moss. It is actually fun to do, but after a while my back started to hurt from the strangely bent position of looking closely from the side while pulling from the top. Any ideas of why the tank would be so bad all of a sudden? Ingo Darn Algae |
Posted 29-Oct-2006 13:17 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | That's what my 50g tank looks like. I'm attempting to make sure all my ferts are consistant, as that's the best I can do. My CO2 is up there above 30ppm so its gotta be something else. Maybe I bottomed out on nitrate or something. I'm going to try to test for stuff later today. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 29-Oct-2006 16:56 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Sorry to hear that your new tank is as bad as this one. At least I can say for sure that this tank does not see ferts often and has no CO2, that together may explain the issues. I hope the tenellus in the 125 is going to take off soon as I will use it to replant this tank and some of the 20. Ingo |
Posted 30-Oct-2006 00:18 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | So, instead of bugging you about the algae in the tank I will post 3 pictures about some of the fish in it. Here is the sole Neon Tetra, he is alone for many months now and doing just dandy Neon Tetra |
Posted 13-Nov-2006 01:32 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And here is my pride, the oldest of my personal mix of Sunset and Twin Bar platies. Not that he is really all that great looking, but it is my first planned cross-breed. As you can see, he has a little red as well. Where the fully black fins come from is beyond me, but all of the fish of this breed have them. And they are of varying ages. Oldest Mix |
Posted 13-Nov-2006 01:34 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And here is another one of that mixed group, they make up 30% of the tank population by now. Interestingly, none of them show distinct signes of sex and I have no clue if they are males or females or whatever. That's it, Ingo Another Morph |
Posted 13-Nov-2006 01:35 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | I'd guess that the twin bar platys come from the line of the "wag" platys that have fully black fins and tails. Whatever you xed it with must have that trait somewhere in its genetic code as well, otherwise it wouldn't show up. and a note....these flowers are getting to me I may have to take a hiatus from the site if I don't get my danios back. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 13-Nov-2006 05:55 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Whatever you xed it with must have that trait somewhere in its genetic code as well, otherwise it wouldn't show up.And not only that, it seems to be a dominant gene as almost all new fry are yellowish with black fins (and sometines face). And almost all fry bearing platies in the tank are Sunsets. these flowers are getting to me I may have to take a hiatus from the site if I don't get my danios back. Yeah, the flowers in the background would never grow submersed. Ingo |
Posted 13-Nov-2006 14:33 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Ok, I don't have too much time, so I will cut to the chase. The hair algae was unbeatable and I had to remove all moss and all tenellus Here is the tank after another almost major redo: Tank After Redo |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:16 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a Matty-Angle look at it. As you can see, at least for the time being I have an open front. The Tenellus is new in this tank as it has been moved from the 125G: Angle |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:17 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a look from the right side of the tank, in the background you can see a little of the 125 shining through. I hope that the tenellus will prosper as it used to when I first introduced it into this tank. Side View |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:18 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | This is sooo nice. I really like this look a lot better, even though the other was nice too. Cheers TW |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:19 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | The fish for sure were not happy with my redo, as I made a mess in the tank as usual. Nevertheless, this gave me the change for a good vacuuming. Here are the Neon and Platy saying "Are we done yet!" Fish |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:20 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks Robyn, It is nice, but rather bare. Anyway, here is a shot of the surface from underneath. You can see the huge ripples that the HOB makes, wouldn't work for CO2 I guess. Also, note the duckweed Surface |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:21 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Last shot is a closer look at the wood. I scrubbed it like mad in the hope to get rid of the algae. I also turned it around so I get to see the more "rooty" looking side of it that had been out of view so far. Now I will read the kids their goodnight story and then I update the 40 and 125. Have fun, Ingo Wood |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:23 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:24 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | I agree this looks nice. All I want are a few little tenellus to creep up under that anubias in the front left corner and block the rhizome from sight. Did any of the xmas moss get saved? And please keep the ferts constant and don't kill any more tenellus Good job/:' Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:24 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Did any of the xmas moss get saved?That's what I tried the last time. And the result was even more algae. I started with pulling individual strands of moss of the wood and tried to clean them from the algae. After a few branches I gave up, the moss simply has too many small branches in which the hairs get stuck No saves. Ingo |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 02:57 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | Here is the tank after another almost major redo Nice A few tight groups around the DW focalpoint. Now you have a good hardscape backdrop if you decide to do a lawn in the foreground. My Scapes |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 17:58 | |
Tainted Glory Hobbyist Posts: 97 Kudos: 41 Votes: 0 Registered: 03-Dec-2005 | Excuse my ignorance, but what is that plant in the back right corner? How will it do in a bigger tank as a background plant? I'm looking for something to essentially act as a background and perhaps cover parts of the surface. Nice layout, btw. |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 22:26 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | The plant in the back right is echinodorus tenellus, and will not grow tall. Any number of stem plants can be used as a background. Check out tropica and used the advanced search for background plants. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 20-Nov-2006 23:19 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks folks for the comments. Yeah, that is tenellus, the same plant than all over the right hand side. Its growth is better than it will be in this tank as it has been raised in the high tech 125. It reached (long time ago) a height of about 8 inches in my 125, but that is rare. Ingo |
Posted 21-Nov-2006 00:51 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a shot of the tank from yesterday. I have to say that not even one plant in the tank seems to have grown, not even the smallest plantlngs of the tenellus. I noticed some small holes in the hygo and believe it is a lack of potassium, so I corrected this with this weeks water change. Here is the tank, Have fun, Ingo Last Night |
Posted 26-Nov-2006 13:52 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Looks nice, but no growth is not good. Something is amiss. Have you started up with a regular fert schedule again? If so what are you dosing/how much/how often? Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 27-Nov-2006 00:58 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Yes, I have, Matty I dose 1/4 tsp KNO3, 1 pinch of Phosphate, almost 1/4tsp Potassium, and the following day 8ml of micros (125 gets 30ml). All only once a week. But 3 times per week 10ml of Excel. Ingo |
Posted 27-Nov-2006 01:12 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Hmm... that shouldn't be a problem. Maybe everything is just starting to settle in. Almost everything in there is new from another tank. Give 'em another week. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 27-Nov-2006 01:39 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Yeah, That's what I think I am going to do, wait a little longer to see if the growth kicks in sometime. As you may see, some of the tenellus (like way back on right side) is still having a few emersed leaves that the plant is about to shed (or melt). Ingo |
Posted 27-Nov-2006 02:00 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Isn't growth in a non C02 tank always very slow? Maybe too slow to even notice slight growth here & there? You dose 8ml micros? Do I underdose my 43G then?. I add only 10ml for 43G (but I also add 4ml of iron). Cheers TW |
Posted 27-Nov-2006 23:38 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | "Isn't growth in a non C02 tank always very slow?" - Yes Robyn, it is. "Maybe too slow to even notice slight growth here & there?" - Normally I would say yes, but if you have a small runner still attached to a parent tenellus and this runner has 2 1" leaves and buried small roots then I would have expected to see the change. "Do I underdose my 43G then? I add only 10ml for 43G (but I also add 4ml of iron)." - Well, how often do you add 10ml? Once? If you would add them 3 times per week you should be fine. I add 30ml 3 times per week into the 125G, a tank about 3 times as large as yours. Also, it depends on the micro mix as not all have the same concentration. Ingo |
Posted 28-Nov-2006 10:55 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | A week has gone by and I still see no additional growth in the tenellus. Actually, when I compare the pictures from the last 3 weeks then it appears as if the leaves have flattened out, meaning they don't stand up as much as they used to. On the other hand, you may notice that the central anubias is about to flower again Ingo Tank Today |
Posted 04-Dec-2006 01:21 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Well, how often do you add 10ml? Once? If you would add them 3 times per week you should be fine.Oh, I see what you mean I think maybe my 43.5 is fine, but my non C02's may be underdosed. I will ask in my logs next time about those 2 tanks. I'm not knowledgeable enough to comment on why your tenellus seems flattened out - although to me the pic of your tank looks very nice. We will have to wait for the tenellus king, Matty, to enlighten. Congratulations on the annubias flower (again) - but don't you feel robbed by these flowers teasing us. They are only there a day or so, then they pack up shop & go. Cheers TW |
Posted 04-Dec-2006 01:34 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | They are only there a day or so, then they pack up shop & go. Thanks for the input Robyn, Actually, in my low tech tank the anubias flower lasts quite a bit longer, maybe around 5 days to a week. Ingo |
Posted 04-Dec-2006 01:42 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Then I wish my low tech ones would flower - but they don't. Yours must be very happy, to flower on lower light & with no C02. Good job. Cheers TW |
Posted 04-Dec-2006 02:06 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Quick update: Within the last two weeks, the tenellus has not grown a bit. Actually - I slowly seem to see the first signs of this plant going the same route as the previous tenellus plantlings, becoming very static. Given that ferts and maintenance are right on, I am wondering if the Eco is no good. Not because of poison in it or what not, but because I think it may be way too dense for plants with fine roots (I think tetratech mentioned the density as well). Here is the tank last weekend for the NJAGC presentation: Last Weekend |
Posted 17-Dec-2006 15:44 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | The one nice thing for last week was that the Anubias decided to show itself from its best side, aka flower in best stage of being. By now it is actually past its prime, but the second Anubias is getting a new flower now. That's it, Ingo Anubias Nana |
Posted 17-Dec-2006 15:46 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Well, The tenellus in this tank has gone really downhill in the last two weeks. I have no explanation for it, the tank has seen the same care/neglect than it got for the last year and a half. Ever since I added the Eco the root feeders seem not to be doing too well (I see the same in the 20, but plant changed are so much more common that it doesn't show that much). Here is a look at the tenelus last week, this week it looked even worse with almost all leaves really thin and melting. Tenellus |
Posted 01-Jan-2007 23:13 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | In addition, a work related lack of paying attention this week caused me not to see the tank for 3 days, and when I did I noticed that almost all crypts had melted away Anyway, I replaced the tenellus with wisteria clippings from the 125. I know they are not going to last either, but better than nothing for now. Here is the tank yesterday: Tank Now |
Posted 01-Jan-2007 23:15 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Last but not least, here is an angled view of the full tank, with lights and all. As I have not given myself an Xmas or Birthday present yet I think I may make this one a high(er) tech tank as well, adding a canister and CO2. Have fun, Happy New Year, Ingo Angled |
Posted 01-Jan-2007 23:17 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Hi Ingo Ever since I added the Eco the root feeders seem not to be doing too wellThat's interesting. I wonder if any other Eco users have found the same. I replaced the tenellus with wisteria clippings from the 125Looks nice - pity the wisteria will grow so quickly, but how it is right now - it's a very good look. Cheers TW |
Posted 02-Jan-2007 01:24 | |
RNJ_Punk Big Fish Cory Fanatic Posts: 395 Kudos: 114 Votes: 137 Registered: 12-Nov-2006 | Hello LF, I have been paying extra attention to this log (although I still really enjoy keeping up with the others) because of the platies. I thought it was really neat how yours have formed an all new variety of platy in your own tank. I hope mine do that someday (they seem like they would be happy to do so as I cant get them to stop dropping fry).How are yours doing by the way? Are you getting more and more of your own variety showing up than the store bought varieties? Also one more question: I see a hiarchy in my platy colony do you see this also? You can read more in my platy colony log. I aslo think this tank is really nice. I love the natural look of all your tanks and I hope I can acheive that with my 55 gallon. What I am getting at is great job!/:' |
Posted 02-Jan-2007 02:26 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | My tenellus does really well in eco, but I do a lot of ferting...every day. I'm sure it's the inconsistancy, rather than the substrate. I've had tenellus grow in plain gravel, and gravel that wasn't much bigger than sand. It actually seemed to prefer the finer, denser gravel - though I've nevevr seen it do particularly well in actual sand. Sorry 'bout the short entry...I've been going crazy too. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 02-Jan-2007 04:32 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Not much to report on this tank either, just like the 20 it is doing ok. Both Anubias are actually not looking all that great when seen live, I may replace them sooner or later. Here is a full shot, Ingo Tank Now |
Posted 12-Feb-2007 02:55 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Nice growth on the wisteria. The mound shape you have it in is really appealing. I'm not sure what you could replace the anubias with. They look really good IMO...you may want to just replace with new anubias? Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 12-Feb-2007 04:47 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks Matty, When looking at the tank, I notice that a rather large portion of the Anubias leaves are covered with green spot algae that by now forms whole areas over the leaves. Not very sightly. One cannot see this in pictures though. I agree, the Anubias look very nice in these spots, so I may replace them with: Anubias Ingo |
Posted 12-Feb-2007 15:38 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Just a quick new shot from last night, although not much has changed since the last shot. It makes me realize that growth in a low tech tank is really much slower. I added a trimming of my Alternanthera to the tank a week ago, just an experiment to see if it survives and maybe even grows. Have fun, Ingo Tank |
Posted 04-Mar-2007 13:47 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | That is a really pretty shot & a really nice layout you have going there. Nice splash of colour from your fish in the top right hand corner too. Cheers TW |
Posted 04-Mar-2007 14:25 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks Robyn, The picture looks nicer than the tank itself In detail, the Crypts are hanging in, but nothing else, and once in a while a leaf or two are melting away, faster than new leaves grow. The Hygro looses all lower leaves. The two Anubias are pretty much destroyed - Either the leaves have holes (no, not potassium) or they are covered in green spot algae (forming entire carpets on the leaves). New growth is not making up for the loss of covered leaves. The sole plant that seems to be doing great is the Wisteria. Ingo |
Posted 04-Mar-2007 14:56 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Sorry to hear of the plant troubles in there - but if it is any compensation - your picture shows none of the problems and all of the beauty Cheers TW |
Posted 04-Mar-2007 15:00 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | I agree, keen photo skillz LF. Just like Amano himself I bet. I'm sure nobody ever thinks that his plants might have small holes and green spot issues, but I bet he does too. Then he just takes the pics in the right light and angle....and nobody knows it. And btw, it looks like your fish are loving it...I think I've noticed some multiplication.....be glad, I only have 6 fish left. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 04-Mar-2007 16:40 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | keen photo skillz LF. Just like Amano himself I bet OK Matty, what do you want? Your words are way too kind to be offered just as a compliment, you must need something The fish are loving it in this shot because it was taken pretty much right after the water change and they come out to eat the la The 20G is actually going from 3 fish about 2 months ago to maybe 10, but breeding Platies is not really a challenge . Ingo |
Posted 04-Mar-2007 17:07 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | |
Posted 04-Mar-2007 17:11 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | I hope you are wrong with the multiplication statement, the tank is full I think the platies will decide that for themselves . So there really aren't any more in there than before huh? Coulda sworn, anyhow, the do indeed look happy. Breeding platies probably isn't a challenge if you can get them to live. I probably can't even do that. I've gone from having 18 thriving cardinals for a couple years to not even being able to keep fish alive. Freshwater fish anyhow, my SW do just fine...The only special treatment is RO water... I don't need anything per se. But you do a great job with the photos nonetheless. Someone might think you were crazy talking about wilting crypts and algae when they look at your PHotos. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 04-Mar-2007 17:19 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Ok then, Here are two close-ups of the Anubias in the tank. First off, the one on the left side of the tank. It should not be too hard to note the holes in the leaves, even the leaf that is a third gone is visible. Anubias with Holes |
Posted 05-Mar-2007 02:12 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And here is the other one from the middle of the tank. The green algae is pretty obvious. Even the snails have a field day. I assume this one has algae because it sits pretty much right below the flowout of the HOB. Believe me now Ingo Anubias with Algae |
Posted 05-Mar-2007 02:13 | |
Brian1216 Hobbyist Posts: 97 Votes: 0 Registered: 28-Apr-2005 | "And, all looks so green because I use a 65w 6700K light. See This Link for my first reaction when I switched to this light" Little_Fish - I wanted to read about this but the link only takes me to the forum page. Any chance you could repost it? I just got my CF 65W aqualight today for my 29 gallon so i wanted to read about your reaction to it. I'm quite impressed with it so far!!! Thanks. |
Posted 08-Mar-2007 00:51 | |
NowherMan6 Fish Master Posts: 1880 Kudos: 922 Votes: 69 Registered: 21-Jun-2004 | LF, that second picture looks like BGA to me It looks like the algae I used to get on anubias leaves in my hard water shellie tank a long time ago. Maybe trim those old algae leaves and let new growth come in? |
Posted 08-Mar-2007 22:03 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Sorry guys, Don'e have a lot of time. But, this should be the link to the short thread of the green tank. NowherMan6 - nah, that's not BGA, it is more likely an overgrowth of green spot. It does not come off what so ever. Trimming off the leaves would leave the plant with 3 leaves only, rather ugly Ingo |
Posted 09-Mar-2007 22:13 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a quick update from the tank today. The Anubias had to go, I couldn't stand them anymore. I placed some clippings of ferns in place of the middle one, and more wisteria where the left one was. Well, I know it is a little messy and unorganized right now in the tank, but that is ok. I will change it when I have a better idea on what to do, and after I get my canister filter I ordered last week Ingo Tank Today |
Posted 12-Mar-2007 00:39 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Doesn't look messy LF. What cannister did you order? Cheers TW |
Posted 12-Mar-2007 00:57 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | For a 29G, I ordered the big gun, an Eheim Professional II 2026, the same I have on the 40G. This will either cut down on maintenance time (less filter cleaning) or make a jump to High Tech as easy as buying a bottle and a regulator Ingo |
Posted 12-Mar-2007 01:05 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Eheim Professional II 2026, the same I have on the 40GAhh, I've bought 2 of those. They are sitting in the garage, waiting for hubby to come good with my winnings - then I'll order the 2 tanks they are destined for. I thought about the Professional III & came close to ordering one for the intended 4ft tank - but that filter is so large that it wouldn't fit in my cabinet. Too late to change my mind, but as you have the 2026 for the 29G & 40G, I hope they will not prove too small for the tanks I'll be putting them on. Cheers TW |
Posted 12-Mar-2007 14:04 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Robyn, The 2026 for this tank is for sure going to be overkill and I will run it with reduced throttle. It can easily maintain the 40G, even when I didn't turn it up all the way. The III is a monster and has a huge capacity, when it comes to canisters. I have been toying with that filter for the 125G, but I think it is too large for it. The 2026 and the 2028 that are on that tank now maintain it very well, and are together still cheaper than one III. Ingo |
Posted 12-Mar-2007 20:02 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | The 2028 is another I considered & it was going to be for the 4ft & 2026 for the 3ft. I rang to speak to the online LFS for some final questions before ordering, & he told me to save my money & get the 2026 for the 4ft, as well as 3ft - but I have wondered ever since & thought I should have spent the extra. When I ordered these filters back in January, the online firm (who had been around as a shop for a while) just started their internet business & had some great specials on eheim filters. At the time, I could have picked up the III for $300 less than I saw it in-store elsewhere. This place is still cheap, but they are now selling the III for around $150 - $190 more than they were at January. It seemed such a bargain then, that if it would only have fitted in the cabinet, I would have bought it in a flash. As you mention, you can turn the throttle down on all these filters, and I would have had a nice powerful filter, if I ever caught hubby at a weak moment & got consent for a 6 foot tank (well, I can dream can't I) Cheers TW |
Posted 12-Mar-2007 23:29 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | See Robyn, Even on a 6 foot tank I would not be so sure that the III is all that good (speaking of a 125G here, not a 180 or such). You would have to provide enough current to push water to the other end of the tank and in return to get all the gunk sucked up into the filter. And that is a looooong way on such a long tank. I am certain that 2 smaller filters, one on each side, are more effective. Hey - that would be my setup Ingo |
Posted 13-Mar-2007 13:20 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | |
Posted 13-Mar-2007 14:05 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | This week was the 2 year anniversary of this tank. It has undergone quite a few changes during that time, and why would I make an exception on its birthday I added the 2026 filter to the tank, placing the sponges of the AquaClear that used to be on the tank in the bottom of the canister. Something with the filter seems to be off though. It appears as if it sucks in some air through the primer pump, for the last 6 hours (since I added it) it shoots tiny air bubbles out of the spraybar. And I hear the sound of rushing air bubbles in the filter as well. Maybe it goes away in a day or two, if not then I will have to contact Eheim. Besides the new filter, I also moved the heater in a horizontal position in the bottom left back, pretty much no longer visible. I also moved the wood further to the left and removed all hygro from the tank. All crypts have been replanted (which means they probably will melt) and the ferns (nl java and bolbitis) have been moved, with the NL fixed to the wood. As the load of NL that I had already in the tank was not enough I added some more from the 125G. The picture is not too good, I also see that my background needs to be fixed up a little as it is hanging down and creates a gap at the top. Happy Birthday Tank Ingo 2 Years Old |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 01:53 | |
OldTimer Mega Fish USAF Retired Posts: 1181 Kudos: 1294 Votes: 809 Registered: 08-Feb-2005 | Nice, Ingo. The filter may just be settling in. Many times when setting up a new filter there is air in the sponges, filter media or even a small amount in the canister trapped after starting. It will slowly get released from the filter as it is able to draw it down through the impeller and out the spray bar. Should clear up without any problems in a day or two. Jim |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 02:17 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Happy Birfday the tank. My how you've grown....er...filled in nicely. You have definitely changed this tank to "minimal maintenance mode" with the new filter, slow growing sturdy plants and what not. Can't say I blame ya though. Looks nice! Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 02:20 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks Jim for the input - Yes, you were right,the bubbles have gone away. Interesting to me is that this is the third filter of exactly the same type that I set up and I never had a bubble-day before. Maybe it is because of the sponges that I added in the bottom of the filter. Matty - Yup, you found me out . Large filter and little demanding plants make this one hopefully less maintenance intensive, with water changes and such at least 2 weeks apart, if not much longer. Time will tell. On the other hand, with a bottle of CO2 it is quickly convered to a high tech tank now. Here is a shot from this morning: Full Tank |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 21:13 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And here is a closer look at the wood area. Except for the tallest NL fern on the left no other plant needed to be tied to the wood. All other NL fern is just stuck into the gaps provided by the wood itself, very convenient. The Bolbitis is tied to a rock behind the wood. The Wood |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 21:15 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Last but not least, I still maintain my Alternanthera experiment. So far so good, I guess this plant can survive as long as there is medium light available. It has not lost even one leaf since it has been added a few weeks back. That's it, Ingo Alternanthera |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 21:18 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | What are you dosing now if you aren't doing weekly water changes, but have CO2? Also, you say your alternanthera hasn't lost leaves, but has it grown any? Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 21:23 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | No Matty, I don't add CO2, I just meant to say that I could, if I should consider another high tech tank. But currently, nothing like this is in the plannings. It has grown a tiny bit, but for sure not much. I don't think I mind this, as long as it does not collect any algae on it. Actually, static plants have something to them as they reduce maintenance even more Ingo |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 21:30 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Sorry, must've misread. Hopefully you can keep the algae at bay, I remember how those static tenellus turned out Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 21:41 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Yeah, I remember that as well. But now I have an army of nutrient suckers, the wisteria Unlike the tenellus, the wisteria is doing very well in the tank. I have no idea why though Ingo |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 21:50 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | Very nice Ingo. It's a very attractive tank. I forget did you have amano shrimp in this tank. If they could survive with the platys they would should keep the leaves of the slow growers pretty clean. My Scapes |
Posted 18-Mar-2007 23:06 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Nah, No shrimpsters in this tank, I don't trust the gang of Platies. They are quite a wild bunch. The first thing they did after I added the fern this weekend was to nibble off the fine roots Ingo |
Posted 19-Mar-2007 17:10 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Just wondering, Ingo, have you ever tested the gph the 2026 filter gives you. Not what it says on the specs, but what it actually gives you, if you have ever tested it? Cheers TW |
Posted 27-Mar-2007 17:37 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Nah, I would have to hang all kinds of gadgets onto the thing in order to figure that out. I go with my guts feeling about it. In particular in this size of a tank I am not firing it up all the way anyway. Why are you interested in this piece of knowledge? If it would be because low ghp mean less "cleaning" then that would not be entirely true as filter volumne plays an important role. Because HOBs have such a small filter volumne they need loads of ghp so the chance for stuff to get stuck in the filter is higher. Large volumne filters, and the 2026 is one of them (in relative terms) provide much more options for stuff to get attached to the media, and - of course - for beneficial bacteria to settle onto. If you ask because of the usage of a UV filter then gph would matter as it defines what will be killed in the light. So, even if you would know the max "real" flow rate of this filter, this information would only be helpful if you actually would have the filter run at that setting. Ingo |
Posted 27-Mar-2007 18:05 | |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 07:43 | This post has been deleted |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Question comes about because of the UV, but not for it (that's been sorted now). Matty taught me how to measure the flow (no gadgets required - unless a bucket is a gadget). Seems my eheim 2224 runs at around half the stated flow rate, so even though I thought I would have to turn the filter to half throttle, it needs to run at full throttle. Then tetratech joined in & said the eheim ecco on his 72G runs at half the stated capacity (he's not concerned about it, it was just for trying to decide if something was wrong with my filter or not). So I was just curious, if tetratech and I are the odd ones out, or if all eheims only run at half the rate stated on their specs. If that is the case, I am thinking the 2026 I bought for the African cichlid may not be enough. It may be too late to swap it anyway. It is unused, but I bought it back in January. That was all. Cheers TW |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 08:16 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Robyn, What was that tanks size for the Africans again? And wasn't there some tank where you planned to add two filters? My 2026 on the 40G is easily able to handle that tank, even with reduced throttle. OK, I have to mention the fact that planted tanks require less filtration anyway, at least in my opinion. Ingo |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 13:28 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | It will be 72G and no, I didn't have plans to run 2 filters. Originally I was going to get the big gun, Pro 3, but it was physically too big for the cabinet. Next I was going to get the 2028, but well meaning LFS said the 2026 was enough & I should save some money & get it instead. I always thought I should have gone 2028. I've heard the same as you, that planted tanks require less filtration, but these africans are bigger fish & the tank won't be planted. If the 2026 loses as much as the 2224 (actual flow as to compared to specs), that will be close to 50% less turnover than I expected. All the specs say it's plenty big enough, but I wanted maximum turnover for the Africans. Cheers TW |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 13:48 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | I am sorry Robyn, but I for sure would say "you should have gotten the 2028". See, even in my planted 125G - I run a 2028 and a 2026, and only after adding the latter were my water conditions more stable. One of the worst things people can say, IMHO, is "you should have" as it is unproductive, so I am sorry about me doing that. Ingo |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 17:07 | |
NowherMan6 Fish Master Posts: 1880 Kudos: 922 Votes: 69 Registered: 21-Jun-2004 | t will be 72G and no, I didn't have plans to run 2 filters. Originally I was going to get the big gun, Pro 3, but it was physically too big for the cabinet. Next I was going to get the 2028, but well meaning LFS said the 2026 was enough & I should save some money & get it instead. I always thought I should have gone 2028. I've heard the same as you, that planted tanks require less filtration, but these africans are bigger fish & the tank won't be planted. If the 2026 loses as much as the 2224 (actual flow as to compared to specs), that will be close to 50% less turnover than I expected. All the specs say it's plenty big enough, but I wanted maximum turnover for the Africans. See, I think planted tanks need just as much filtration, if not more. The plants themselves do do a lot of filtering, but there's also more organic matter building up in a planted tank, with dead leaves etc. all building up after a while. I'd much rather overfilter than underfilter regardless. Any way you can still finagle the 2028? |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 17:20 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | I agree with most of with LF said. There is a big difference between a fully planted tank with little fish (no pun)schooling around and one with less or slow growing plants with meatier fish like africans. That being said I still think you'll be O.K. The 2026 is rated for up to 92g, that's a plus for you. It really depends how big and how many fish you will stock, your water change schedule, your lighting of course. Also in a tank with africans, wouldn't you be using chemical filtration as well (carbon). There are also some good products that will help absorb organics before they become nh3. One that comes to mind is Seachem's Purigen. It's inexpensive and you could stick a few of them in the Eheim to help. Also if you put your fish on the tetra diet that would be another plus for you. EDIT: Nowher I think we posted at the same time, but I do disagree with you for several reasons. Most people that don't have heavily planted tanks are more attracted to some nice meaty fish. These fish give off much more waste and there aren't any or not as many plants to help absorb it. So one has to strictly rely on the actual filter itself. Also the actual food going in is much greater in these "fish tanks" then it would or should be in a planted tank with little fish (no pun) My Scapes |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 17:28 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | I agree that a lot of it will have to do with stocking, but if the fish load is of average on what people add to such tanks (forget the 1" per gallon rule) then the 2026 will be pushing it, IMHO. Also, Purigen is not my kind of thing. All the fuss with recharging ( takes like what? 36h? - and is not endless) or paying for each new batch does not make it practical for permanent use, IMHO. Also, I think it would require replacement/recharging rather often with messy fish in the tank. The finer the filter (so to speak) the faster if gets filled up. NowherMan6 - I also think that planted tanks need less filtration than unplanted tanks, given they function as intended. If all your plants are dying all the time (no pun intended either, well - maybe, ) then you sure have loads of dead matter, but in a healthy tank, no way. Ingo |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 17:47 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | I hear ya LF, but the Purgien is just something that will help (if it's needed). Remember with "real fish" one has to maintenance the filter more anyway, so when you open it you replace the purgien. You just need a few of the ready to go 100ml bags. Every take a look at what's in the sump of saltwater FO tanks. There is all kinds of absorbent media to help cleanse the water. My Scapes |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 18:44 | |
NowherMan6 Fish Master Posts: 1880 Kudos: 922 Votes: 69 Registered: 21-Jun-2004 | I still disagree. I think that with our tanks, which feature relatively high light, CO2 injection and the addition of fertilizer, we need as much filtration - especially biological filtration - as possible. With all of those variables our water has to be as pure and organic free as possible, otherwise we're serving a free buffet for algae. In a planted tank we also need to be concerned with flow and getting that variable right. I guess we can all agree that regardless it's better to over filter than under |
Posted 28-Mar-2007 21:15 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | I still disagree. I think that with our tanks, which feature relatively high light, CO2 injection and the addition of fertilizer, we need as much filtration - especially biological filtration - as possible. With all of those variables our water has to be as pure and organic free as possible, otherwise we're serving a free buffet for algae. In a planted tank we also need to be concerned with flow and getting that variable right. You dare to challenge the self-proclaimed king of protist destruction. Remember even though you adding those things the plants are processing them and then we are refreshing the tank with 50% or so WC. In addition remember the biological filtration is taking place in the tank possibly more so than in the filter depending on tank size and stock. So you still think no3 and po4 causes algae in a well planted tank? Bensaf where in the world are you, please talk some sense into this Checky Young Pup. My Scapes |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 01:01 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Oooo I wanna jump in late on this one. OK, all IMO here, but planted tanks don't need and shouldn't have nice pure water. If it did, why would we add fertilizer to the tank. I'd seriously damage anyone who put 10-20ppm of NO3 and 2ppm of PO4 in my reef tank. The only thing we are trying to accomplish with a filter is reduction of ammonia through water movement, which is generally less in a planted tank. To argue the other way though, if you were going to stock a planted tank with as much fish mass as a malawi cichlid tank, where it's wise to overstock for aggression reasons, you'd bet I would want more filter on there than if there were just a group of small schooling fish. All said, I think you will be alright with your filter, Robyn. Like tetratech and I debated about so long ago, both filter surface area/size and flow rate need to be taken into account. Canisters in general have slower flow rates and larger filter areas. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 01:18 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | OK, all IMO here, but planted tanks don't need and shouldn't have nice pure water. If it did, why would we add fertilizer to the tank The Mod speaks, there is silence followed by Define Pure Well, I think there is a difference between the organics that sit in a tank from fish and food that eventually will break down into nh3 and those that we put in from no3 and po4 for ferts. I agree if you stock a planted tank with alot of fish you would need more filtration, but that's the whole point. The planted tanks don't generally have those kinds of fish thus the need for filtration is less. Simple example, Nano tank filled with growing plants, no filter required. Nano tank filled with growing fish, major filter required - Fade to black. My Scapes |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 13:41 | |
NowherMan6 Fish Master Posts: 1880 Kudos: 922 Votes: 69 Registered: 21-Jun-2004 | So you still think no3 and po4 causes algae in a well planted tank? Bensaf where in the world are you, please talk some sense into this Checky Young Pup. Actually NO3 and po4 etc. that form in the tank, yea, I think that's the bad stuff. I thought that's why we do water changes and add our own NO3 etc. The KNO3 from the bottle is inert and harmless. Isn't that one of the points Bensaf was making? It's OK to add our bottled KNO3 and PO4 because it's harmless - it's the nitrate, phosphate, ammonia (ammonia being the most harmful, thus the need for a big biological filter) build-up through tank process that really causes algae. Or maybe I'm just imagining things here, and the wisdom passed on through several hundred pages of threads is all mixing into one big ball of misinformation in my brain. |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 14:03 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | IMO there's no difference between the natural forming NO3 and the stuff we put in our tank as KNO3 except for the added potassium. It's simple chemistry. NO3 = NO3, period. I had a tank that was well filtered with two large well fed angels. I never added KNO3 to the tank until I removed the angels due to aggression. It's only the ammonia step we want to skip. The organics that are excreted as fish waste are mostly ammonia. Some PO4 too. What do plants live off in the wild? organics and waste. There's NO way they could live off chemicals different than what they have already evolved to use. I guess I'll define pure for ya....the water I use to mix up my SW has a measure of 0 TDS. Zero total dissolved solids. That means no NH4, NO2, NO3, PO4, or any other mineral or organic substance. Pure. That's what my reef tank gets, pure water. H20. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 14:35 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | So, yeah none of us are using pure water in our planted tanks, certainly not out of the tap anyway. I agree with where Matty is going with the no3 is no3 thing. When it gets broken down why should that be different than the regular process. Here's why I don't think no3 causes algae. If you follow EI, which most of us to some extent, your constantly dumping no3 and po4 into the tank. Even though the plants are using it there is always or should always be some levels in the tank. So regardless of the plants uptake if there is still no3 in the wc why wouldn't algae grow. The whold idea of EI is to keep no3, po4 in a range, but we do know that when nh3/nh4 is available we have problems. In a well planted tank since the uptake of nh3 is supposely quicker this usually isn't an issue so the tank can deal with having high light, etc. My Scapes |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 14:58 | |
NowherMan6 Fish Master Posts: 1880 Kudos: 922 Votes: 69 Registered: 21-Jun-2004 | |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 15:22 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | All this is IMHO. Do as you wish, there is no harm in overfiltering. This all started with flow I belive. I don't think you need as much flow in a planted tank as you do in a nonplanted one. Media capacity and runthrough is bigger. BTW Nowhere what filter are you using on the 65g? My Scapes |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 15:52 | |
NowherMan6 Fish Master Posts: 1880 Kudos: 922 Votes: 69 Registered: 21-Jun-2004 | I know I know, I'm just having a bit of fun. For the 65 I'm pretty sure I have an eheim 2217 classic. I went for the classic style because I liked the idea of the water going in one end and coming out the other with no place to bypass within the filter. I had that problem with the ECCO - one section of the media would be clean all the way through , meaning the water wasn't going through the media as it was supposed to. I chose the size of the 2217 because I remember reading that Jeff Senske uses 2215s on a ~40G tanks, and since mine is more than 20G larger I figure why not go the next step up. The flow can be turned down easily enough, but I really want the bio-filtration surface area. |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 16:14 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | That's really funny, I went with the 2213 classic for my 46g. I also was going to purchase a 60cm tank, but decided for now to use my 46g since I already have lighting, etc. It might be a bit small, but obviously I'm not worried about it. I really like my ecco, but wanted to see the difference first hand between the classic and ecco. My Scapes |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 16:37 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | That's the spirit At least we agree on something, being overfiltering is not a bad thing Why not a Professional II guys? Too expensive? Ingo |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 16:58 | |
NowherMan6 Fish Master Posts: 1880 Kudos: 922 Votes: 69 Registered: 21-Jun-2004 | Apologies to Ingo for thread hijacking... Did you set up the 46G again? I thought that was going to be the SW tank EDIT: Posted at the same time as Ingo - I agree with tetra, I wanted to see how well the classic cannister filter worked with the "in one way, out the other" structure of the filter. Heard lots of good things about them, and there really wasn't a ton of reason behind it besides that. The ones with the built in heaters were awfully tempting - ya know, anything to keep stuff out of the tank |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 17:07 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | Did you set up the 46G again? I thought that was going to be the SW tank Well yeah, but the SW tank is definitely on hold for a while. I simply don't have a place to put it with the sump. Sorry Matty! The professional was tempting, but I was keeping the expense down. I'll probably go with one of those hydor inline heaters. I've heard good things and besides it will slow down the flow of my 2213 My Scapes |
Posted 29-Mar-2007 17:17 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Sorry Ingo, I seemed to have sidetracked your thread for a bit here. But thanks to everyone who chipped in with filtering advice, which seems, in the end to be that yeah the 2026 might be ok, but more is better for the meatier fish. I've checked the height of my cabinet & the height of the 2028. I have around 580cm (around 1ft 22 inches) and the 2028 needs 455cm (1 ft & 18 inches). Does that give me enough height for the hoses (so as they are not too bent over) and enough room for maintenance? Ingo, you have this on the 125g - what do you think? I still don't know if I can swap it (or not) but if you guys think it will fit, I'm going to ask. Thanks (sorry again for thread stealing Ingo) EDIT: Correction to those measurements. I gave the height of my cabinet at the front edge, where there is a little extra piece of wood tacked in. Inside the cabinet itself, I have just a touch over 2ft. If you can, pls let me know if you think I have enough space for 2028. Cheers TW |
Posted 31-Mar-2007 01:16 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Robyn, I will have to go and do some comparison measurements later in the day to answer your question. This would be the ba Height of the 2028 = 45,5 cm Height of the 2080 = 56,7 cm --- so about 11 cm taller The way the hoses come out seem to be of similar angle. Is the back of your cabinet open or are there just a few holes in ther for all the tubing? Ingo |
Posted 31-Mar-2007 12:24 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Sorry Ingo, I made an error. I know the 2080 will not fit, or rather that I think the fit is just too tight to work out. Having said that, if it did fit, that was my original choice, but I figure it's way too big for the space. My questions in my last post should have been about 2028. So wherever I said 2080, I really meant 2028. Sorry to confuse the issue. So if you're able to, could you pls look at your 2028 and see if you think I have enough clearance. I have 60.96cm in the main part of the cabinet. As I mentioned, at the very front of the cabinet, I lose a little height, due to a piece of wood being nailed in place there for the cupboard latches, but where the hoses are I have the full 60.96cm. When I was originally going to buy the 2028 back in January, I decided myself that I did have space, but since you have one in action & therefore know how it works & how much room you need for for access space, I thought it wouldn't hurt to ask. My cupboard has a full back in it and the only holes are ones hubby makes for me, so I can get all the leads in & out. Thanks Ingo. Cheers TW |
Posted 31-Mar-2007 14:05 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Ok Robyn, I did some measuring. The height from the top of my back opening to the bottom of the shelf on which the filter sits is 22", or about 56 cm. As you can see, I have some "extra" space available. So I tried to gauge how much lower it could be, which is about 2", or a little over 5 cm less, totalling about 51 cm needed height of the top of the back opening. Reason why this has to be higher than the filter itself: The hoses come in in an upward angle. Would that fit? Ingo 2028 |
Posted 31-Mar-2007 18:40 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a newer picture, from yesterday, of the tank. I had added a few more clippings of NL Java Fern from the 125G to the wood in this tank about a week ago as the crypts on the left continued to melt, due to moving them. Full Tank Yesterday |
Posted 01-Apr-2007 10:39 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a "not-so-good" shot of the area just to the right of the wood in the back, not that visible when looking at the tank head-on. There you see a collection of smaller crypts (Wendtii green and red), a newly added baby Tiger Lilly, and the Bolbitis roots affixed to a rock. Detail I |
Posted 01-Apr-2007 10:42 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a close-up of the "Alternanthera Experiment" It keeps on growing little by little, no leaves lost so far, and the plant is in there quite a while now. It lost a little of its color when compared to the 125G, but not too bad. Detail II |
Posted 01-Apr-2007 10:43 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | The Wisteria in this tank is doing excellent so far, no die-offs to report and slow but healthy growth. Here is a look at some of it, plus a male platy chasing a female Detail III |
Posted 01-Apr-2007 10:45 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Last but not least, here is a close-up of the Fern Farm Most of the wood is covered with NL Java Fern, the Bolbitis is visible on the right of this picture. It had collected a little of BBA and this has been treated yesterday with Excel, but it was not too bad anyway. That's it for now, Have fun, Ingo Detail IV |
Posted 01-Apr-2007 10:47 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Very nice pics LF. I especially like the fern farm & wish I could find NL here - but so far, it is nowhere to be found. Thanks for the responses re the 2028, but I felt bad about sidetracking your thread, as the question seemed to be taking up too much room. So, I started a new thread here [link]http://www.fishprofiles.com/files/threads/33582.1.htm?0.653483# [/link]and continued the conversation there. If ever you have a spare moment, wondering if you might take a visit there. Thanks in advance. Cheers TW |
Posted 01-Apr-2007 14:57 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Very little has changed in this tank over the last few weeks, here are a few notable differences: - The Neon has gone to fish-heaven, he was dead when I came back from vacation (but still in one piece, so he must just have died). He was about 2 years old, I think that is pretty much in line, right? - The Wisteria keeps on growing well. - The Alternanthera started to grow, I assume it needed some serious time to settle. It probably doubled in size to maybe 5" since being added about 5 or 6 weeks ago. - I received a Najas Indica during yesterday's NJAGC meeting and planted it for the time being to the right of the driftwood. I will see how it does. That's it, Have fun, Ingo Last Night |
Posted 29-Apr-2007 14:26 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a look at the tank from today, all plants seem to be growing nicely. Overall, the tank gives me pretty much no trouble at all and works well with its maintenance schedule of every other week. Full Tank This Weekend |
Posted 13-May-2007 23:46 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | If you look at the lower left area of the full shot then you note that I added some Anubias there. 3 Nanas were trades received from our NJAGC meeting this weekend (I handed in some fern), the two Nana Petites are from the 20G QT and originally also received via trade. Nanas |
Posted 13-May-2007 23:49 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a closer look at the Alternanthera these days. I have to say that I am surprised to how well it does. Yes, it grows rather slow, but it still has its beautiful color. I guess one can say that it works well for medium light tanks. Alternanthera |
Posted 13-May-2007 23:51 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Last but not least, here is a close-up of the Najas indica. Also a very pretty plant and growing at rather fast speed (for this tank). I am not certain what to do with it in the long run, but its fine leaf structure sure lends itself for a nano, so whoever has one, it may be worthwhile checking into this plant. That's it for now, many more shots are in my other logs (all 4) in a few minutes, Ingo Najas Indica |
Posted 13-May-2007 23:54 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Just a qick new full tank shot: The nana petites that were parked on the left of the tank have been removed and added to the 125, the Najas indica has been trimmed a few times, part of the trimmings went to the 125 and the 20. Growth is good the Alternanthera now really looks out of place, but I think I will soon conclude that growing this plant in this tank will work. I may remove it for now and maybe add a small group at the next redo. The Wisteria is taking over all open spaces and needs a trimming soon as well. Ingo Tank Yesterday |
Posted 03-Jun-2007 13:31 | |
niko001 Hobbyist Posts: 71 Kudos: 54 Votes: 8 Registered: 02-Mar-2005 | It is getting nicer and nicer everyday that I follow this thread./:' |
Posted 03-Jun-2007 13:47 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo , great shots as usual . I can smell another Ingo Style redo coming on here Love the way the wisteria works in this tank . Might try some myself . Garry |
Posted 03-Jun-2007 14:06 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks niko001 and Garry for the input I think the tank has reached the point where it cannot get much better with the current layout. From here on, all would just grow more, although that may be interesting as well. At least the fact that it is a low tech tank with the resulting slow growth gives me some time before I would have to take any kind of action. Ingo |
Posted 03-Jun-2007 16:46 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Tank Update - I ended the Alternanthera experiment yesterday. It had simply outgrown its position but it worked out quite all right, the plant was growing with slow speed (aka not much trimming needed) and lost only a few leaves at the bottom. I would assume that it is not suitable in this tank if there were a few stems close to each other as shading would most likely cause more dead leaves in the lower areas, maybe sometime worth another experiment. I actually moved into phase II, I left the lower part of the stem planted to see if new stems sprout out of it. The Najas indica that I planted a while ago is doing very well in this tank, I trim it about every other week and replant the tops. Here is a shot from last night, have fun, Ingo June 16h, 2007 |
Posted 17-Jun-2007 12:36 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo , I really love the Najas Indica in this tank . Is there a common name for it? . My LFS always gets confused with scientific names So can I just get something straight, the Alternanthera grew well in this low tech tank ? Now you are trying to grow some from a bottom cutting ? Garry |
Posted 18-Jun-2007 03:59 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | I have to agree with Garry. That is the best looking most well behaved najas grass I have ever seen. More power to ya. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 18-Jun-2007 04:49 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks guys for the input, Garry - I don't know a common name for this plant, maybe Matty hinted to one when he called it Najas grass . I got mine, 3 small stems to be precise, during a plant swap of my local club meeting (see signature line). The only downside I see with it is the planting. I have had no success yet getting two stems into the substrate at once, at least one will float back up. I am mostly convinced that this plant loves to float and doesn't seek a substrate to root. Now you are trying to grow some from a bottom cutting ? Well, yes, but more by degree of laziness . The plant was becoming too tall in the front and took away from the Najas view too much. But, not wanting to make much of a mess, I simply cut the stem about 2 inches above the ground and kept the stomp in there. In the worst case, I will remove it next week during the water change. Oh, btw, with the Eheim 2026 on the tank I reduced water changes to 50% every 3 weeks. Ingo |
Posted 18-Jun-2007 13:53 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Just a quick update on the tank as of yesterday, 4 weeks after the last update. Growth in a low tech tank, even with medium light, is really slooooooow. So, overall not much has changed. The Wisteria for some reasons is growing stronger in some stems than in others, not a problem though, just an observation. Here is a full tank shot from last night: Tank 7/14/2007 |
Posted 15-Jul-2007 14:47 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | The Najas indicat is growing very fast though, it had to be trimmed twice in the last 4 weeks and most tall stems were added to the 125G when cut off here. The Alternanthera, on the other hand, grows really slow, you may remember that I left about 2 inches of the stem in there after I cut off the top. This is the growth I got from it in the last 4 weeks. That's it, have fun, Ingo Alternanthera Growth |
Posted 15-Jul-2007 14:50 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Quick Update on this tank. Not much has changed, the Najas has been trimmed twice since the last shot, the Alternanthera is becoming visible again. Growth and losses are really slow, see the left side of the wisteria which is beginning to suffer from a lack of light. Also, the platies are overpopulating the tank again. Have fun, Ingo 8/6/2007 |
Posted 06-Aug-2007 13:51 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Well, I found a little time yesterday, about 8 hours to be exact, to do what I had in mind for this tank. Here is a shot beforehand: Tank I |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 12:40 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | About 2.5 hours later, the tank looked like I just bought it. All useful plants where placed in a bucket, the top parts of the substrate where scooped up into another bucket (with as little of the gravel that I used as a bottom la Tank II |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 12:45 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Next up was the setup of some rock borderlines to divide the individual substrate areas. This was the easy part, LOL. Tank III |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 12:46 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | This was followed by the careful placement of Eco Complete (the parts that were scooped out and saved) and Pool Filter sand, about an inch at a time of each, until the substrate was all in. Tank IV |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 12:48 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Next came the next, and almost final part, of the hardscape, some "twigs". It wasn't quite what I had in mind, but any other arrangement of the wood did not quite work out stable enough. Tank V |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 12:50 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Then came another painful step, about 20 Nana Petites (the ones I stored in the 125 for a while) where mostly attached to rocks and placed around the twig groups. Tank VI |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 12:51 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Then I painfully trimmed about 80 stems of pearl grass in the 125 and planted each top individually in this tank, followed by a few Wisteria stems and some Wendtiis (that probably may melt away) and that was the end of it. Here is the tank, Have fun, Ingo Tank VII |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 12:53 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | LF, Wow still do the LF still makeovers! It looks pretty good! Was it hard to keep the sand and eco separated? Any thoughts for moss/ricca on the twigs/rocks? That might look sharp. 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 14:41 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Wings, Thanks for the input. No - it wasn't all that hard to keep the eco and sand separated, only once in a while a little eco fell on the sand, but was scooped up quickly with a measuring spoon and disposed of. Moss may be nice, I might do that at some point, but as we know moss spreads all over the place. Riccia - probably not. After all, it is a low tech / low maintenance (as in infrequent ferts and Excel) tank. Ingo |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 16:20 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Neat look LF. I like the sticks. The only think I can think of is that it needs some more tall plants to take a little focus of the wood. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 17:16 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Matty, Thanks for the input. I am not so sure that I want to take the focus of the sticks, I kinda like the rather landscaped look (vs the aquascape). The sticks are the trees and they are surrounded by lower growing shrubs. If that makes any sense. Anyway, here are a few more details: Here is the left smaller planted group Left Group |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 18:23 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And here is the right group. As you can see - I pretty much replicated the plants from the left over here as well (right Garry? - LOL ), or maybe I should say that I explicitly decided to have plants present in both groups. Right Group |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 18:25 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | I still have to figure out the camera settings as the whitish sand makes all images so much brighter. Here is a look from the right side of the tank. You can see that the sand front is rather narrow. From The Right |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 18:27 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And yes, you may have noticed it in the last picture, I could not resist and planted my Alternanthera "Experiment" in the right side of this layout as well. It may not get enough light over there though, time will tell. I wouldn't mind if it stays small and short leaved, could be a nice alternative to other red plants. Alternanthera "Experiment" |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 18:29 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Last but not least, the head on shot of the full tank in the style that I usually use to present the tank. I am almost done cleaning up the mess I made while redoing this tank, LOL, just a few more buckets to clean. Thanks for the input, Ingo Frontal Shot |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 18:31 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | Hi LF, Nice to see you back in action. I really like it , along with my lip lick I will of course nit pick. I think you've done a really nice job with the twigs positioning and the way they go over the valley in the middle. I agree keep the canopy kinda bear and thicken up the area around the ba The only thing I would change is the position of the anubias at the end of the path on the left and right. It should be moved up near the where the path widens. This will create a better depth illusion. I would also vary the size of a few rocks to make it more natural looking. It looks more like a man-made path now. Otherwise very nice! Regards, TT My Scapes |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 19:21 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Tetratech, your nit picking is always welcome I might agree with the Nana position, for now I will leave it as be so things can settle. BTW - there are no fish in the tank yet, I am not sure I mentioned that. Thanks for the comment, Jeff, Ingo |
Posted 03-Sep-2007 22:29 | |
fishmonster Big Fish Oh My Heck! Posts: 329 Kudos: 88 Votes: 73 Registered: 11-Apr-2007 | LF, i love the new look of this tank, kinda gives it a wintery feel at the moment with nothing on the twigs. What kind of wood did you use btw?.... I like the contrast in the two gravel types and the seperation of the rocks. Again what kind of rocks are they? Is all this going to stay low to the ground? Are we looking for a more sheltered look at this point? Thanks for your input as always, Shane http://thetanklog.blogspot.com/ - [ Thanks to ScottF ] http://www.natureaquariumclubofutah.com/main.html |
Posted 04-Sep-2007 06:48 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | What did you do with all the fishes?? 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 04-Sep-2007 12:21 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Hey LF, just re-discovered this log. It had dropped off my active thread list. Well, you beat me to it. My new planted tank (which is getting closer to reality) will have the sand contrast as well, although we will differ in our hardscape. BTW, I love your hardscape. Those are great pieces. And, yes, pls tell us all where your fishies are? Cheers TW |
Posted 04-Sep-2007 15:27 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Who cares about the fishies? Let's assume they went to another tank, ok? Anyway, here is a quick update on how the tank looked last night, in case you care. Have fun, Ingo Tank 29 |
Posted 07-Oct-2007 22:16 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | LF, This tank is looking killer! I really like it. So the fish are in another tank? Ok. I will leave it at that. Do you have any plans for fish/shrimp in this tank? I don't seem to see anything moving around in there. 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 08-Oct-2007 00:01 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | I don't seem to see anything moving around in there. Well, I see one of my inhabitants, but it is hard to make out. Two weeks back, during the last addition of a batch of Nana Petites that I received from a fellow NJAGC member, I inherited a juvenile Red Cherry Shrimp. He was in there by himself, with a bunch of snails, for over a week before I was able to capture a mature female Red Cherry Shrimp in the 40G, probably the last Cherry that was in there. I added her to this setup right away. Yesterday I went out and made some purchases, 3 shrimp that are either Red Nose Shrimp "Caridina gracilirostris" or Yellow Nose Shrimp "Xiphocaris elongata", and 5 Pygmy Cories "Corydoras pygmaeus". Attached is a shot of one of the Nose Shrimp, she is pregnant but larvae is just like any other Caridina, aka brackish and salt. Thanks for the compliment Wings, Ingo Nose Shrimp |
Posted 08-Oct-2007 01:23 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Oh, and to what critter was visible in the full shot, if you look up from the right section of where the sand hits the back wall, just in the area of where the stick ends, you see one of the Pygmy Cories. Here is one, not such a great shot though. Ingo Corydoras pygmaeus |
Posted 08-Oct-2007 01:25 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | I kind of thought that was a fish but I had no idea what kind it might be. How are you liking the Pygmy Cories? I thought about picking some up quite a while back and never did. Neat shrimp too! I have looked at the red nosed shrimp before and thought they were pretty cool. Do you think yours will change into the reds or stay yellow? How are they at eating algae? What type of moss do you have in there? 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 08-Oct-2007 22:30 | |
fishmonster Big Fish Oh My Heck! Posts: 329 Kudos: 88 Votes: 73 Registered: 11-Apr-2007 | Ingo, The Pygmy cories are kewl, they have an otto sence to them, the black striping and the way they look. Totally awesome. So just to bring me up to date, you have the shrimp and pygmy cories in this tank. Shane Thanks for your input as always, Shane http://thetanklog.blogspot.com/ - [ Thanks to ScottF ] http://www.natureaquariumclubofutah.com/main.html |
Posted 09-Oct-2007 08:38 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Shane, The list of animals in this tank is in the same post than the one where I show the shrimp picture, just four up from here (or five, maybe, LOL). In short, yes, they are in this tank. Wings and Shane, The Pygmies are cool - and tiny, about half an inch max at this point. They are cute little buggers and - as I have been told before - are more of a midwater fish than other cories, at least when not threatened. The shrimps have red nose tips, at least from some angles. I have heard that the Red Nose shrimp is very similar to the Yellow Nose, but seems to have more red in certain angles, in particular in pictures. They eat algae just fine, eat it of the branches and the sand. Ingo |
Posted 09-Oct-2007 14:24 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Those are pretty sweet LF. I've been wanting a few of those. Well when I had a FW tank I did. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 09-Oct-2007 17:46 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Wow Matty, Did I miss an official announcement about you being a pure dark-side person now? What happened? Do you at least still have the frog? When you say pretty sweet, you mean the cories, right? Or the shrimp? Ingo |
Posted 09-Oct-2007 18:09 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | At first glance the cory looks like an oto. Nice shrimp, how big are those. In between Amanos and cherries? Those eyes are freaking me out, but to a fish it probably looks tasty. My Scapes |
Posted 09-Oct-2007 18:42 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Both are pretty dang sweet, though it was the cories I had always though about getting. We get them in our store from time to time. Now I just don't have a tank for fw fish. Well a few of you freshies found out I had done some consolidation. There wasn't an announcement on my FW tank thread though. I don't want to hijack your thread so I'll say it was a combination of not wanting to and being unable to take care of all my tanks for several reasons. Since you ask, the poor frog died a while back due to a genetic disease called short tongue syndrome. Couldn't catch flies and slowly starved. It tore me up a bit to watch an animal in my care starve with nothing I could do, so I didn't want to post it. I do still have my 5.5 cherry shrimp tank, though it's in much disarray, but has some new life in it: what I believe are two furcata rainbows. They are still a bit small to be 100%, but I'm at about 95% sure they are. I'll have to move them out of there eventually, or they'll eat my baby shrimps. Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 09-Oct-2007 18:45 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | At first glance the cory looks like an otoTry working in a LFS when someone puts the two in the same tank! Makes it a mess trying to show them to some who doesn't really know what either are. We wont even talk about trying to catch them. 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 09-Oct-2007 23:09 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks guys for the input, See, I actually don't think that the Cories look like Otos, maybe because I have never seen such a tiny Oto. Even in the LFS Otos are about 1 inch plus and these guys are half that size at best. The Red/Yellow Nose shrimp are in size between Amano and Cherry, that is correct. At least that is what I see now. I remember when I got my Amanos, they were about the same size than these guys. Now they are, at least in the 40G, tanks . BTW, I found another cherry in the 40G last night and successfully fished it out and transferred it into this tank. Thanks again, Ingo |
Posted 10-Oct-2007 14:06 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo , How did I miss this , Simply stunning . I love it . Can't wait to see this scape mature , will be very interested in how the hardscape holds up as the plants grow .Particularly the driftwood as ATM I think the stark look is amazing .I also love the way you have the river going straight back and ending in a beach , I think it gives good depth . I sometimes think thats what I should have done with mine instead of going for an angle which dissappears as the plants grow. The corys are great looking little fellas as well . As a recent convert to the cory world I must say those little guys look cute . Do they school like the other types ? Mine just pile in on top of on another . I will certainly be checking this log more often now . Thanks for the inspiration. Garry Ps I think I need another tank , better start working on the wife . |
Posted 10-Oct-2007 14:19 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Garry, My current vision with this tank is that the plant growth will be held in check by trimming to be about the same as it is now. The only plants that I really care to work their way around naturally is the moss (Wings - forgot that in an earlier response, it is Flame Moss). It is starting to attach itself to the branches with I think is great, I just have to make sure that I don't create too much shading for the other plants. All other plants, in particular the HM, are only meant to form a more natural appearance, like hanging over the rocks etc. And overall, my shots of this tank in full really suck, either too red or too green. I will try to get better shots soon. The tank is actually prettier when seen directly. Well, with the exception of the sand that is, there is a little BGA on it and a lot of poop form the snails/shrimp/fish . Ingo |
Posted 10-Oct-2007 17:50 | |
fishmonster Big Fish Oh My Heck! Posts: 329 Kudos: 88 Votes: 73 Registered: 11-Apr-2007 | Ingo Thanks for the answers on that. I love those cories. Any chance you can tell us where you got them? I would love to see if i can get them round here. Do you know what the latin name for them is? Anyways please keep posting on this tank Shane Thanks for your input as always, Shane http://thetanklog.blogspot.com/ - [ Thanks to ScottF ] http://www.natureaquariumclubofutah.com/main.html |
Posted 11-Oct-2007 06:13 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Shane, I got the Cories in my LFS, that would be in NJ. I take it that this would be a looooong trip for you The Latin name of Pygmy Cories is, tata, Corydoras pygmaeus. Wasn't that hard to find out, the internet is your friend Thanks for the input and the encouragement to keep on posting, I will try to get better tank shots soon, Ingo |
Posted 11-Oct-2007 15:01 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Heyah, Look what I just got in the mail for this tank: Uuuuuuhhhhh |
Posted 12-Oct-2007 00:07 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | Just don't break it like tetra did. Wait was it tetra? I think it was. 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 02:01 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | By the shape of the funnel I could tell it's the Cal Aqua one's. Yeah Wings I did break mine, but Cal Aqua sent me another one for the cost of shipping. I really like them, but for some reason the intake I received (and I don't know if it was an early production model or a different size)had large holes that trapped and killed 3 of my Otos. I could see the one you got LF has the smaller holes, so it won't be a problem. Now this tank has a glass top doesn't it. So what is LF up to now with these lily pipes. My Scapes |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 02:14 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | Now this tank has a glass top doesn't it. So what is LF up to now with these lily pipes.Well the last I knew, LF had a Aquaclear filter on this tank. My guess is that he is going to change it out to a canister and add Co2. 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 02:46 | |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 05:18 | This post has been deleted |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Well, Jeff you seem to have started a trend here at FP with these cal aqua lily pipes. Mine 2 sets are still packed neatly in their box, but hope to put them to use soon. Good luck with them LF. I think they look nice. Cheers TW |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 05:20 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks folks for the input Before I forget it, this is from an entry I made on page 12 of this log, from March 17th, stating "I added the 2026 filter to the tank" The intake is also clearly visible in each shot of the full tank This filter, btw, has not even been cleaned once ever since, not even after or during the redos. I think it will see a little cleaning this weekend though. tetratech - the back part of the tank has the plastic strip and I plan on adding both in and outflow in that area, to the left side. Yeah, my holes look rather small to me and I don't think a fish/shrimp would fit through it. Not to downplay tetratech's influence on lots of things I do with my tanks, the pipes are not part of that. This has been inspired by actually seeing them in action in the tanks of a few of my fellow NJAGC buddies. I truly hope I don't break them when I add them to the tank, most likely today Ingo |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 12:46 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | Not to downplay tetratech's influence on lots of things I do with my tanks, the pipes are not part of that. This has been inspired by actually seeing them in action in the tanks of a few of my fellow NJAGC buddies.Just so I get this right. Is there anything super special about these other than them looking really cool? Before I forget it, this is from an entry I made on page 12 of this log, from March 17th, stating "I added the 2026 filter to the tank"I guess my attention to detail is rather limited these days. 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 12:56 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Is there anything super special about these other than them looking really cool? Well, if I go by what my NJAGC members tell me then the water flow seems to be distributed by the funnel very nicely, causing a good mix within the tank. Otherwise, they look cool and are less offensive inside the tank than a gray spraybar and intake. I guess my attention to detail is rather limited these days. Don't worry Wings, so is mine, with the exception of this tank. All others are blah-blah Ingo |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 13:21 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | Not to downplay tetratech's influence on lots of things I do with my tanks, the pipes are not part of that. This has been inspired by actually seeing them in action in the tanks of a few of my fellow NJAGC buddies So do you have enough room to put the on the side where the strip would go so the funnel faces side to side vs back to front? If not I guess you could corner it. You could also completely remove the glass top. I've had no issues with my 46g with the top remove and the light on legs. One additional benefit of the lily pipes is that the opening for the return water is on the bottom of the funnel. And since the funnel is large the opening for the water sits far below the tank edge. Is allows alot of evaporation before air mixes with the return water hurting co2 levels. My Scapes |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 14:35 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | So do you have enough room to put the on the side where the strip would go so the funnel faces side to side vs back to front? That's what I am hoping for I actually haven't measured it yet, but I am sure i will come up with something. I don't think I will go without a glass top, I don't like too much evaporation. I saw what a difference this makes on the 40G where I easily lost about 2 to 3 gallons a week when not using a top. In this tank that would be 10%. Hey, here is another look at the Red or Yellow Nose Shrimp, turning the tides towards the notion that they are Red Nose: Shrimpster |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 14:58 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And here is a look at the group of Pygmy Cories, during their "every-other-day" feeding. Usually they hang in gangs of 2 or 3, or even by themselves, but feeding brings them together. Have fun, Ingo Da Gang |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 14:59 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Quick Update, Well, that didn't work out the way I thought. In particular the inflow looks rather weird on this tank, sticking way too wide into the water column and away from the side, bummmer. In addition, I sure had placement issues, just like tetratech hinted to. I am not willing to remove the top and as such found a compromise, I just use the outflow pipe and I placed it on the other side of the tank (right). I didn't cut the hose from the filter and as such a switch back to the Eheim system can be easily accomplished (I hope). Here is a quick shot of the tank, Ingo Half Hearted Attempt |
Posted 13-Oct-2007 16:59 | |
jase101 Big Fish Posts: 345 Kudos: 273 Votes: 1 Registered: 06-Jul-2004 | *sigh* this is just gorgeous, ingo, i absolutely love it. justin |
Posted 14-Oct-2007 04:45 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks Justin, Glad you like it. I decided to keep the setup with only the uptake pipe from Cal Aqua and may use the inflow in another tank at some other tank. Here is a picture taken this morning, Ingo For The Time Being |
Posted 14-Oct-2007 16:33 | |
Posted 14-Oct-2007 17:00 | This post has been deleted |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Hey, Maybe you like this cropped version better, let me know what you think about it. Ingo Same Image - Different Crop |
Posted 14-Oct-2007 17:03 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo , actually I think the uncropped version is better , gives the tank a little more volume if you know what I mean . This shot is a little too red though , a white balance issue maybe ?. The colour on the previous shot looks more natural . I always have problems getting that part right in my shots . I'm interested in your comment that you are going to keep all the plants low . Does that include background plantings as well ? Garry |
Posted 18-Oct-2007 14:53 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Garry, Thanks for the input. You nailed the white balance thingy on the head . I was playing with taking RAW shots and that is what happened, LOL. I usually find my shots too green because of the 6,700K lighting, this time I went too far into the red when picking my "white" spot in the picture. I promise I will keep on working on it. With regards to the plants. Yup, all that grows on the bottom will stay low, with the exception of the single Alternanthera in the right corner (growing reaaaaalllly slowly) and the few Wendtiis in both back corners. Height is supposed to be achieved by the plants on the sticks, aka Petites and Flame Moss. Thanks for the input, Ingo |
Posted 22-Oct-2007 00:41 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo , Ok , I didn't look hard enough at the Driftwood sticks ,I get it now . The tank will look like this for a long time at that rate of growth . On the Camera issue , I have the same problems , which I deal with partly thru white balance in the camera and partly thru post processing. Takes a bit of time and I don't always get it right either Garry |
Posted 23-Oct-2007 14:38 | |
clownloachfan Fish Addict Posts: 660 Kudos: 850 Votes: 115 Registered: 10-Oct-2003 | Nice change. What type of moss is that? Fissidens? |
Posted 26-Oct-2007 06:15 | |
fishmonster Big Fish Oh My Heck! Posts: 329 Kudos: 88 Votes: 73 Registered: 11-Apr-2007 | Ingo I love the look you have with this tank. The twigs of DW plus the flame moss really do make it look like the wood is on fire. Awesome look. Whats the full name for the petites. I cant see them well enough to really know what they are. Shane Thanks for your input as always, Shane http://thetanklog.blogspot.com/ - [ Thanks to ScottF ] http://www.natureaquariumclubofutah.com/main.html |
Posted 28-Oct-2007 23:55 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is another lousy look at the tank. The moss is Flame Moss and the petites are called Anubias nana petite. Just a picture, Ingo 11/10/2007 |
Posted 11-Nov-2007 15:52 | |
FRANK Moderator Posts: 5108 Kudos: 5263 Votes: 1690 Registered: 28-Dec-2002 | Hi, Is that pieces of Flame Moss in clumps scattered in the foreground? IMO, I don't think I like them there, it obstructs the beautiful carpet that is growing along the substrate and the view toward the rear of the tank. Frank -->>> The Confidence of Amateurs, is the Envy of Professionals <<<-- |
Posted 11-Nov-2007 17:35 | |
clownloachfan Fish Addict Posts: 660 Kudos: 850 Votes: 115 Registered: 10-Oct-2003 | Flame moss!!!, i can see it now. I agree with frank on it obstructing the foreground, but it still looks good to me. You could move the all of the flame moss to the rest of the space left on the branches and get a low growing variety of moss or another type of plant. |
Posted 11-Nov-2007 18:19 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo , Whats lousy about it ? This is a stunning design and I for one would like some closeups and views from some different angles . So how about it give us a closer look . Garry |
Posted 12-Nov-2007 05:57 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | I can really tell now that you have flame moss up front. Before I thought it was Hair grass. I also think it is a little bit distracting. 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 12-Nov-2007 14:39 | |
tetratech Ultimate Fish Guru Posts: 4241 Kudos: 1074 Registered: 04-Nov-2003 | |
Posted 13-Nov-2007 15:53 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | A little update with a few pictures. The tank has seen its share of neglect over the last few weeks, so lots of stuff has surpassed the tolerated levels. Here is a shot from earlier this weekend. Bad Ingo |
Posted 02-Dec-2007 17:31 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | I also played for a while with a white background, that is what you see in that last shot. Here is a look at the BGA invested foreground. BGA on Sand |
Posted 02-Dec-2007 17:32 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | This is the tank after much needed maintenance, many trims and the addition of Maracyn into the sand had happened. After Cleanup |
Posted 02-Dec-2007 17:33 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a series of pictures of the tank's shrimpsters. First one the younger Red Cherry Shrimp marching over the BGA invested sand RCS |
Posted 02-Dec-2007 17:35 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | A look at the RCS and a new shrimp, the CRS, side by side. Overall I got 4 CRSs on Friday. CRS and RCS |
Posted 02-Dec-2007 17:36 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a closer look at a CRS by itself, mine of course are non-special bread and do not have the extreme beauty others do, but good enough for me. CRS |
Posted 02-Dec-2007 17:37 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Last but not least, my resident Red Nose Shrimp, one of two, the third committed suicide by climbing out of the tank and roasting under the light on top of the tank. That's it, Have fun, Ingo Red Nose |
Posted 02-Dec-2007 17:38 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | |
Posted 05-Dec-2007 04:13 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | CRS! Very nice even if they aren't the top dollar shrimp. Do they breed like RCS? 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 05-Dec-2007 13:46 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Garry, BGA - Blue Green Algae - is actually not an algae but Cyanobacteria, and Maracyn (maker is Mardel) is an Antibiotic (Erythromycin) that kills it. Wings, Agreed, they are pretty low class, and I can't see them 99% of the time as - unlike all other shrimpsters - they are rarely out in the open. And from what I know, yes, they breed like RCS, conceptually speaking, with baby shrimp that will survive in fresh water. Ingo |
Posted 09-Dec-2007 16:25 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo ... so how goes the battle against the BGA ? Garry |
Posted 13-Dec-2007 02:07 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Garry, The BGA is gone after only two treatments of half dosage. I don't have a new tank shot, but I can report that the Wisteria needs a major trim, it reaches above the lower branches. Here is one detail shot though Ingo Snail Ahoi |
Posted 24-Dec-2007 15:51 | |
GobyFan2007 Fish Addict Posts: 615 Kudos: 363 Votes: 65 Registered: 03-Feb-2007 | I love this tank.... Especially the open area on the top of the tank. I love the area in the middle, the path... Great Job, and it looks awesome!!! Keep up the Good work!!! ><> ~=!Vote Today!=~ <>< -----> View My Dragons <----- |
Posted 24-Dec-2007 21:59 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Time for a quick update: I placed the 96w light over this tank to get the sides more ""enlightened" but overall it is too much. So I added some water lettuce from the 125G to reduce the light somewhat. I also removed all mosses, flame and fissidens, from the branches as they turned into algae (thread) magnets. Here is the tank, Have fun, Ingo 1/20/2008 |
Posted 21-Jan-2008 01:34 | |
brandeeno Mega Fish Posts: 929 Kudos: 636 Registered: 13-Sep-2007 | love the look of this tank and it has surely come a long way!!! is this really a 29g? it looks HUGE! my 29g looks so small compered to this, but i guess goo aquascaping does a tank good! grat DW and well AMAZING! \\\\\\\"an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of the cure\\\\\\\" |
Posted 21-Jan-2008 05:14 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | Nice aquascaping LF. I like this tank. Enjoyed the shrimpsters too Cheers TW |
Posted 21-Jan-2008 12:40 | |
ScottF Fish Addict Addiction Hurts!! Posts: 542 Kudos: 330 Votes: 355 Registered: 28-May-2007 | |
Posted 21-Jan-2008 17:42 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo...hmmmmm ...not sure if its the camera shot ...but the tank looks a little green...as in algae green . 96w on a low tech tank = lots of problems ....or so I thought . Can you enlighten (no pun intended) ? Garry |
Posted 22-Jan-2008 02:21 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Thanks folks for the input, here are some comments: brandeeno - Thanks for the compliments, and yes, it is really a 29G Robyn - long time no see, thanks for the compliments. ScottF - I am most certain that fish are ok with the twigs, not any more dangerous than rocks that are not smooth. Garry - You are right, the tank looks a little green. 96w of 6,700K do tend to give it a rather greenish color, in particular in pictures (no time for fancy color corrections, LOL). The green background doesn't make it appear less green either, LOL. Funny thing is, last weekend I changed the background color, just for the fun of it (I tend to do that once in a while). So now it is red. Here is a shot from last weekend, Have fun, Ingo A Red One |
Posted 04-Feb-2008 01:14 | |
TW Fish Master * * *Fish Slave* * * Posts: 1947 Kudos: 278 Votes: 338 Registered: 14-Jan-2006 | |
Posted 13-Feb-2008 14:16 | |
fishmonster Big Fish Oh My Heck! Posts: 329 Kudos: 88 Votes: 73 Registered: 11-Apr-2007 | LF Thats definetly a different shot of the tank with the red background, doesnt look too bad at all. I was wondering and im sorry if i missed this but do you get your shrimp locally or from online?? Shane Thanks for your input as always, Shane http://thetanklog.blogspot.com/ - [ Thanks to ScottF ] http://www.natureaquariumclubofutah.com/main.html |
Posted 16-Feb-2008 23:10 | |
catdancer Big Fish Mad Scientist Posts: 471 Kudos: 138 Votes: 13 Registered: 15-Apr-2007 | Very nice background, it shows the aquascape so much better than the door. Hey, what about some vertebrate life, a few fishies would compliment the layout (I hope you relaize my wording taking into account that you put the focus in your tanks on the plants and not the fish) |
Posted 18-Feb-2008 06:16 | |
brandeeno Mega Fish Posts: 929 Kudos: 636 Registered: 13-Sep-2007 | a school of 15 cardinal tetras would look stunning in there... also what do you use for your background? \\\\\\\"an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of the cure\\\\\\\" |
Posted 18-Feb-2008 09:27 | |
jase101 Big Fish Posts: 345 Kudos: 273 Votes: 1 Registered: 06-Jul-2004 | hey there ingo, long time no post! as far as the scape is concerned, i think you need to reduce the plant species in the tank, keep the foreground plant only (sorry, don't know what it is), and clip/plant it into a shape so it just looks like hills of green with the dead trees 'growing' out of it. as far as wildlife, i was just thinking the same as brandeeno - what this tank needs is a dazzling shoal of cardinal or ember tetras! embers would be great as they are so small yet quite bright. dunno how they'd go against the red background... or, a single sturisoma panamense or other whiptail catfish - it would sit among the branches at times and look quite dragon-esque. i've put a post up of my planted tanks at last - do pop in if you have time! |
Posted 18-Feb-2008 11:18 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Hi there, thanks for all the input, here are some comments: Robyn, thanks for the compliment. Yes, the red is dramatic, LOL, but it contrasts the dark blue of the 125G, which is located to the left of this tank, rather nicely. I will see what the feedback of the local club is when the members see the tanks live for the next time. Shane, thanks for the compliment as well, and the shrimps were bought locally. catdancer, yeah - I sometimes wonder if I should add some life to the tank, LOL. The few pygmy cories are rarely seen, sometimes I wonder if they still are alive. Recently I saw 4 out of 5, so that's good. I have one red nose left, and maybe one cherry, plus maybe 4 crystal reds. brandeeno - Cardinals, good water quality, meaning another thing to worry about. Nah, not now! The background is made of thicker cardboard sheets found at hobby stores. Justin, yeah, scape could be better, but time is limited . I did some trimming of the HM in front of the right group, but way more needs to be done to whip this tank into shape again. Here is a look at the tank this weekend, Thanks again for the input, Ingo 2/18/2008 |
Posted 18-Feb-2008 15:04 | |
catdancer Big Fish Mad Scientist Posts: 471 Kudos: 138 Votes: 13 Registered: 15-Apr-2007 | I see, reminds me of my dwarf puffer tank. 4 of them in there and nowhere to be seen in pictures. however, you could easily add some tetras, just as an example for a family of ornamental fish or some rasboras in a tank of this size. Not necessarily the cardinal tetra, although you have soft water, right adn therefore you provide ideal conditions for these fishes. I like the scape but think that some more plants clinging to the branches of driftwood would provide nice accents. Claudia |
Posted 18-Feb-2008 15:39 | |
mattyboombatty Moderator Tenellus Obsessor Posts: 2790 Kudos: 1507 Votes: 1301 Registered: 26-Mar-2004 | Too bad the shrimps aren't working well for ya. Any thoughts as to why? Critical Fertilator: The Micromanager of Macronutrients |
Posted 18-Feb-2008 17:26 | |
fishmonster Big Fish Oh My Heck! Posts: 329 Kudos: 88 Votes: 73 Registered: 11-Apr-2007 | I was going to ask that same question matty. I recently purchased some cherries and im having a similar experience with loosing them. Thats why i asked about purchasing them because I thought if LF bought them offline then I would try the same source. Tank looks great LF and I agree with claudia on the plants on the wood as would stand out more. Shane Thanks for your input as always, Shane http://thetanklog.blogspot.com/ - [ Thanks to ScottF ] http://www.natureaquariumclubofutah.com/main.html |
Posted 18-Feb-2008 20:03 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Claudia - I will have to think about new fishies for this tank, maybe in a while. As I have spent so much time in the last maybe 6 months working on my scaping skills (and this tank is not so great, I know) I forgot all about fish. Matty - The shrimp are not NOT working, there are just not that many. At least one red nose jumped ship and was grilled on top of the glass, a red cherry died of old age, and the crystals are probably all still here. Claudia and fishmonster - don't know about plants on the branches, all mosses collected algae and other plants are just too big. Some Low-Grade (meaning in shot quality and shrimp quality) shots of the crystals: Shrimpsters I |
Posted 19-Feb-2008 01:26 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And another one of one of these two shrimp, with a third in the background. I only recently learned on how to grade these shrimp in the first place. Shrimpsters II |
Posted 19-Feb-2008 01:27 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | And the other one from the first shot, this one I believe is a male while the one in the last shot is probably a female. One more reason not to add fish to the tank Ingo Shrimpsters III |
Posted 19-Feb-2008 01:28 | |
brandeeno Mega Fish Posts: 929 Kudos: 636 Registered: 13-Sep-2007 | maybe if you added a single pair of some sort maybe apisto would work? they stay small and there are nty of plant for babie shrimpies to hide, no? well it is your tank... we cant tell you what to do... but i still think it lacks some life! \\\\\\\"an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of the cure\\\\\\\" |
Posted 19-Feb-2008 09:44 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | This tank used to seem so bright and happy. Now it seems quite dreary. Maybe it is the floaters cutting down on the lighting. How are your little cories doing? I am sorry your shrimp aren't working out too well. 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 19-Feb-2008 13:28 | |
Countryfish Fish Addict Da...Dum .. Da...Dum Posts: 645 Kudos: 83 Votes: 242 Registered: 16-May-2007 | Ingo ...Well I haven't commented since you changed the background .. IMHO it doesn't do anything for the tank ..takes the focus off what is a stunning design . I find it very hard to look at the plants and scape with that background . Anyway just my 2cents . The more I look at the design ...I tend to think that the Wood on the left should go and that side should be kept low ..then the right side should have some tall plants added to the wood . Or Plant both sides heavily to give the river thru the jungle look . Again just my opinion but this tank looks and feels unfinished as it is . So your probably going to say MYOB ..but when I look back to the first stunning photo of this scape the potential hasn't really developed...a problem I understand very well .. believe me I feel that way about my tank . Any way just some thoughts ...hope you don't mind . Garry |
Posted 20-Feb-2008 14:13 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | So your probably going to say MYOB .. Absolutely NOT! Everybody is allowed to say what they have on their mind, in the worst case I just don't agree Let me try to explain this tank's current layout to you, with regards to history and the other tanks: First, the 20G got a mainly rock layout, then this tank got a sand bank. Both of these tanks can rather easily be changed to something completely different as I have done so many times in the past. But, the point here is, what is the result of combining rocks with sand: RIGHT, MY 40G! I have not had a rock layout or sand before, so I needed to gain pratical experience before commiting a whole tank to it. In short, the 20G and the 29G are experimental tanks not even intended for showcasing, I play here with plants, hardscape, background, and anything else possible. They are not meant as permanent installations either and as such finding the right fish for a current layout may be the wrong fish for the next one. Does that make sense? As to the red background, I will keep it a few more weeks, even if its purpose is only to create a riot at the next NJAGC meeting which will be held at my place again Ingo |
Posted 20-Feb-2008 16:01 | |
LITTLE_FISH ***** Little Fish ***** Master of Something Posts: 7303 Kudos: 1997 Votes: 670 Registered: 20-May-2005 | Here is a quick update. I did some more trimming/replanting as the HM grew a little out of control, but now the tank bottom is even more bare. And for some reason it is a long time ago that I got a good shot of the tank Ingo EDIT: Do you see the two Pygmy Cories and the two CRS? 3/1/2008 |
Posted 03-Mar-2008 02:25 | |
Wingsdlc Fish Guru What is this? Posts: 2332 Kudos: 799 Registered: 18-Jan-2005 | I spy the shrimp! One just on the left side of the sand and the other to the right of the sand on the driftwood right above the wisteria. No luck on the cories though... 19G Container Pond [IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/Wingsdlc/Ric |
Posted 03-Mar-2008 13:25 | |
fishmonster Big Fish Oh My Heck! Posts: 329 Kudos: 88 Votes: 73 Registered: 11-Apr-2007 | Ingo The cories are on the left by the glass ehehe... dude i really like this tank and the red background. BTW when is that meeting you were talking about?? have they seen it yet? I gotta know the outcome of that. Btw you should check out the changes to my tanks and let me know what you think Shane Thanks for your input as always, Shane http://thetanklog.blogspot.com/ - [ Thanks to ScottF ] http://www.natureaquariumclubofutah.com/main.html |
Posted 04-Mar-2008 07:52 | |
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 |
Jump to: |
The views expressed on this page are the implied opinions of their respective authors.
Under no circumstances do the comments on this page represent the opinions of the staff of FishProfiles.com.
FishProfiles.com Forums, version 11.0
Mazeguy Smilies